Re: [Numpy-discussion] Should non ufunc numpy functions behave like ufunc regarding casting to output argument ?

an error on shape mismatch; type mismatches are used to forcibly cast the result - which is useful! So I'd say we take it seriously. It's one of the ways to make your code run faster. A. M. Archibald ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: Advanced selection, duplicate indices, and augmented assignment

might want this for. A. M. Archibald A. M. Archibald ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Re: [Numpy-discussion] The risks of empty()

, but there are tools to help with what you want to do. A. M. Archibald ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Newbie Question, Probability

On 21/12/06, Alan G Isaac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A Dijous 21 Desembre 2006 05:59, A. M. Archibald escrigué: It seems to me that numpy should include only tools for basic calculations on arrays of numbers. The ufuncs, simple wrappers (dot, for example). Anything that requires nontrivial

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Newbie Question, Probability

of compatibility with Numeric and numarray; shortly it will have to worry about compatibility with previous versions of numpy as well. A. M. Archibald ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo