On 09/23/2015 06:07 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 8:12 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
Hi all,
I'm pleased to announce the availability of Numpy 1.10.0rc1. Sources and 32
bit binary packages for Windows may be found at Sourceforge. Please test
this
On 08/11/2015 11:23 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
Hi All,
give this release a whirl and report any problems either on the
numpy-discussion list or by opening an issue on github.
I'm pleased to announce the first beta release of Numpy 1.10.0. There
is over a year's worth of enhancements and bug
Hi!
I just finished porting a large code-base to Python 3 (making it work on
2.6, 2.7 and 3.4). It wasn't that difficult, but one thing gave me a
hard time and it was this:
Python 2.7.9 (default, Apr 2 2015, 15:33:21)
[GCC 4.9.2] on linux2
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more
On 01/26/2015 11:02 AM, Jaime Fernández del Río wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:41 AM, Sebastian Berg
sebast...@sipsolutions.net mailto:sebast...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Mo, 2015-01-26 at 09:24 +0100, Jens Jørgen Mortensen wrote:
Hi!
I have a view of a 2-d complex
Den 30-09-2013 17:17, Charles R Harris skrev:
Hi All,
NumPy 1.8.0rc1 is up now on sourceforge
http://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/1.8.0rc1/ .The
binary builds are included except for Python 3.3 on windows, which
will arrive later. Many thanks to Ralf for the binaries, and to
Hi!
With numpy 1.5, I get this:
a = np.ones((2, 2))
(2 * a.T).strides
(16, 8)
With 1.6, I get this:
(2 * a.T).strides
(8, 16)
So, this means I can't count on new arrays being C-contiguous any more.
I guess there is a good reason for this.
Anyway, I just thought I would mention it here -
Jens Jørgen Mortensen wrote:
I would like all these arrays to be contiguous:
import numpy as npy
npy.__version__
'1.0.4.dev3967'
x = npy.arange(4)
y = x[npy.newaxis, :]
z = x.reshape((1, 4))
for a in [x, y, z]:
... print a.shape, a.strides, a.flags.contiguous
...
(4,) (4,) True
On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 07:08 -0700, Steven H. Rogers wrote:
I'd prefer reStructuredText. I don't find the markup particularly noisy and
it quickly fades into the background.
I found some notes on the docutils page (about using reStructuredText in
docstring):