Re: [Numpy-discussion] Inconsistent behavior for ufuncs in numpy v1.10.X

New issue submitted here: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/7122 I suggest moving this discussion there. On 1/26/16, 10:49 AM, "NumPy-Discussion on behalf of Solbrig,Jeremy" wrote: >The problem isn’t specifically with _optinfo. _optinfo losing information is >just

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Inconsistent behavior for ufuncs in numpy v1.10.X

The problem isn’t specifically with _optinfo. _optinfo losing information is just a symptom of the fact that __array_prepare__, __array_wrap__, and __array_finalize__ do not appear to be working as documented. So far as I can tell, there is no way to access attributes of subclasses when using

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Inconsistent behavior for ufuncs in numpy v1.10.X

, 2016 at 10:35 AM To: Discussion of Numerical Python mailto:numpy-discussion@scipy.org>> Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] Inconsistent behavior for ufuncs in numpy v1.10.X On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Solbrig,Jeremy mailto:jeremy.solb...@colostate.edu>> wrote: Hello Chuck,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Inconsistent behavior for ufuncs in numpy v1.10.X

ssion of Numerical Python mailto:numpy-discussion@scipy.org>> Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] Inconsistent behavior for ufuncs in numpy v1.10.X On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:11 AM, Charles R Harris mailto:charlesr.har...@gmail.com>> wrote: On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:43 PM, Solb

[Numpy-discussion] Inconsistent behavior for ufuncs in numpy v1.10.X

Hello, Much of what is below was copied from this stack overflow question. I am attempting to subclass numpy.ma.MaskedArray. I am currently using Python v2.7.10. The p