On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:36:18AM +0200, Ville M. Vainio wrote:
I think the killer issue here is Launchpad. We get pretty much
everything for free, and it's something that we can expect to stay
around in the long haul (and will continue to improve). The slight
performance disadvantage of bzr
Gael Varoquaux wrote:
I have watch developpers switch to DVCS lately, and I must say it
requires a certain change in working habits. Let us wait for people to
get used to these new tools before discussing which one to you.
I personally think that the supposed difficulty of DVCS is greatly
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 07:08:31PM +0900, David Cournapeau wrote:
Gael Varoquaux wrote:
I have watch developpers switch to DVCS lately, and I must say it
requires a certain change in working habits. Let us wait for people to
get used to these new tools before discussing which one to you.
Gael Varoquaux wrote:
Look, I am not talking about theory,
I was not talking about theory:
- svn co url - bzr co url
- svn commit -m bla bla - bzr ci -m bla bla
- svn up - bzr up
- svn log - bzr log
- svn blame - bzr blame
You cannot be more concrete than that :)
I agree
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 07:26:13PM +0900, David Cournapeau wrote:
Gael Varoquaux wrote:
Look, I am not talking about theory,
I was not talking about theory:
- svn co url - bzr co url
- svn commit -m bla bla - bzr ci -m bla bla
- svn up - bzr up
- svn log - bzr log
-
2008/3/26, David Cournapeau [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Gael Varoquaux wrote:
Except that very often when you do a bzr up you have to do a merge
because bzr makes obvious branching that is implicit with the svn model.
bzr does not branch implicitly, as far as I know, so I am not sure to
