On 9/14/11 8:32 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
but my mind is racing around NumPy 3.0 at this point.
Travis, could you clarify this point? Do you mean:
There are so many ideas my mind is racing around too much to even think
about 3.0?
or
My mind is racing with ideas so much that I want to dive
On 09/15/2011 12:56 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:32 AM, Travis Oliphant teoliph...@gmail.com
mailto:teoliph...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Has there been a discussion of a 1.7.x release of NumPy? There
are a few new features that should go into the 1.x
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Bruce Southey bsout...@gmail.com wrote:
**
On 09/15/2011 12:56 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:32 AM, Travis Oliphant teoliph...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi all,
Has there been a discussion of a 1.7.x release of NumPy? There are a
few new
Hi all,
Has there been a discussion of a 1.7.x release of NumPy? There are a few
new features that should go into the 1.x release of NumPy, that don't require
the ABI changes of 2.0.I thought I had heard Mark talk in support of such a
thing.
What are the plans for the release
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:32 AM, Travis Oliphant teoliph...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi all,
Has there been a discussion of a 1.7.x release of NumPy? There are a
few new features that should go into the 1.x release of NumPy, that don't
require the ABI changes of 2.0.I thought I had heard Mark
