Re: [Numpy-discussion] Buildbot/continuous integration (was Re: Issue Tracking)

2012-02-17 Thread Stéfan van der Walt
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Chris Ball ceb...@gmail.com wrote: After getting to this initial stage, I'll discuss about adding more features (such as testing pull requests, performance testing, building binaries on the different operating systems, etc). Also, if it's working well, this

[Numpy-discussion] Buildbot/continuous integration (was Re: Issue Tracking)

2012-02-16 Thread Chris Ball
Ralf Gommers ralf.gommers at googlemail.com writes: ... While we're at it, our buildbot situation is much worse than our issue tracker situation. This also looks good (and free): http://www.jetbrains.com/teamcity/ I'd like to help with the NumPy Buildbot situation, and below I propose a plan

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Buildbot/continuous integration (was Re: Issue Tracking)

2012-02-16 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:52 PM, Chris Ball ceb...@gmail.com wrote: Buildbot is used by some big projects (e.g. Python, Chromium, and Mozilla), but I'm aware that several projects in the scientific/numeric Python ecosystem use Jenkins (including Cython, IPython, and SymPy), often using a

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Buildbot/continuous integration (was Re: Issue Tracking)

2012-02-16 Thread Travis Oliphant
The OS X slaves (especially PPC) are very valuable for testing.We have an intern who could help keep the build-bots going if you would give her access to those machines. Thanks for being willing to offer them. -Travis On Feb 16, 2012, at 6:36 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: Hi, On Thu,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Buildbot/continuous integration (was Re: Issue Tracking)

2012-02-16 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote: The OS X slaves (especially PPC) are very valuable for testing.    We have an intern who could help keep the build-bots going if you would give her access to those machines. Thanks for being willing to offer