Re: [Numpy-discussion] Chararray depreciated?

2009-12-07 Thread Pauli Virtanen
ma, 2009-12-07 kello 09:17 -0500, Michael Droettboom kirjoitti: > Also noticed that > > http://docs.scipy.org/numpy/docs/numpy.core.defchararray.chararray/ > [clip] > I suspect fixing this at the implementation level may be too > difficult/dangerous, but for documentation purposes, is there a way

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Chararray depreciated?

2009-12-07 Thread Michael Droettboom
Also noticed that http://docs.scipy.org/numpy/docs/numpy.core.defchararray.chararray/ lists a number of methods that are really applicable. For example "sum". This is a side effect of course of chararray inheriting from ndarray, and the documentation isn't "wrong" -- chararray has a "sum" me

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Chararray depreciated?

2009-12-07 Thread Michael Droettboom
If this: http://docs.scipy.org/numpy/docs/numpy.core.defchararray.chararray/ is the most recent revision, then it looks good to me. It does seem to incorporate my new text -- in case there was any confusion about that. Mike David Goldsmith wrote: > On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 6:36 AM, Ralf Gommers

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Chararray depreciated?

2009-12-06 Thread David Goldsmith
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 6:36 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Gael Varoquaux < > gael.varoqu...@normalesup.org> wrote: > >> >> Excellent. I tweeked a bit the text to make it clearer: >> http://docs.scipy.org/numpy/docs/numpy.core.defchararray.chararray/ >> >> I made it

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Chararray depreciated?

2009-12-06 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Gael Varoquaux < gael.varoqu...@normalesup.org> wrote: > > Excellent. I tweeked a bit the text to make it clearer: > http://docs.scipy.org/numpy/docs/numpy.core.defchararray.chararray/ > > I made it clear that the replacement are present only starting numpy 1.4. > I

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Chararray depreciated?

2009-12-06 Thread Gael Varoquaux
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 01:11:24PM +0100, Ralf Gommers wrote: >[2]http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/generated/numpy.chararray.html >> says that chararray are depreciated. I think I saw a discussion on the >> mailing list that hinted otherwise. Which one is true? Should I correc

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Chararray depreciated?

2009-12-06 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Gael Varoquaux < gael.varoqu...@normalesup.org> wrote: > > http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/generated/numpy.chararray.html > says that chararray are depreciated. I think I saw a discussion on the > mailing list that hinted otherwise. Which one is true? Shou

[Numpy-discussion] Chararray depreciated?

2009-12-06 Thread Gael Varoquaux
http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/generated/numpy.chararray.html says that chararray are depreciated. I think I saw a discussion on the mailing list that hinted otherwise. Which one is true? Should I correct the docs? Cheers, Gaël ___ NumPy-Disc