I haven't commented yet on the mailing list because of time pressures although
I have spoken to Mark as often as I can --- and have encouraged him to pursue
his ideas and discuss them with the community. The Numeric Python discussion
list has a long history of great dialogue to try and bring
So obviously there's a lot of interest in this question, but I'm
losing track of all the different issues that've being raised in the
150-post thread of doom. I think I'll find this easier if we start by
putting aside the questions about implementation and such and focus
for now on the *conceptual
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
So obviously there's a lot of interest in this question, but I'm
losing track of all the different issues that've being raised in the
150-post thread of doom. I think I'll find this easier if we start by
putting aside the
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
So obviously there's a lot of interest in this question, but I'm
losing track of all the different issues that've being raised in the
150-post thread of doom. I think I'll find this easier if we start by
putting aside
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
So obviously there's a lot of interest in this question, but I'm
losing track of all the different issues that've being raised in the
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
So far I see the difference between 1) and 2) being that you cannot
unmask. So, if you didn't even know you could unmask data, then it
would not matter that 1) was being implemented by masks?
I guess that is a
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
So far I see the difference between 1) and 2) being that you cannot
unmask. So, if you didn't even know you could unmask data, then it
would
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
So obviously there's a lot of interest in this question, but I'm
losing track of all the different issues that've being raised in the
On 6/25/2011 2:06 PM, Benjamin Root wrote:
Note that np.sum([]) also returns 0.0. I think the
reason why it has been returning zero instead of NaN was
because there wasn't a NaN-equivalent for integers.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empty_sum
fwiw,
Alan Isaac
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
So far I see the difference between 1) and 2) being that you cannot
unmask. So, if you didn't even know you could unmask data, then it
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
On 06/25/2011 07:05 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Matthew Brettmatthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
To clarify, you're proposing for:
a = np.sum(np.array([np.NA, np.NA])
1) - np.NA
2) - 0.0
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
I guess that is a difference, but I'm trying to get at something more
fundamental -- not just what operations are allowed, but what
operations people
On 06/25/2011 09:09 AM, Benjamin Root wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com
mailto:n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu
mailto:efir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
On 06/25/2011 07:05 AM, Nathaniel Smith
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
I guess that is a difference, but I'm trying to get at something more
14 matches
Mail list logo
