Hi,
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Freddy Rietdijk
wrote:
> On Nix we also had trouble with OpenBLAS 0.2.15. Version 0.2.14 did not
> cause any segmentation faults so we reverted to that version.
> https://github.com/scipy/scipy/issues/5620
>
> (hopefully this time the
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Julian Taylor
wrote:
> On 09.02.2016 04:59, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Matthew Brett
>>> wrote:
On 09.02.2016 04:59, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Matthew Brett
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Mon, Feb
On 09.02.2016 21:01, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Julian Taylor
> wrote:
>> On 09.02.2016 04:59, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:04 PM,
On 09.02.2016 20:52, Matthew Brett wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 7:59 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Matthew Brett
>>> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 8,
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 7:59 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Matthew Brett
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Nathaniel Smith
>>> ==
>>> ERROR: test_multiarray.TestNewBufferProtocol.test_relaxed_strides
>>> --
>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>> File
>>>
On Nix we also had trouble with OpenBLAS 0.2.15. Version 0.2.14 did not
cause any segmentation faults so we reverted to that version.
https://github.com/scipy/scipy/issues/5620
(hopefully this time the e-mail gets through)
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Daπid wrote:
>
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Julian Taylor
wrote:
> On 09.02.2016 04:59, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Matthew Brett
>>> wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Evgeni Burovski
Date: Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:56 AM
Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] Multi-distribution Linux wheels - please test
To: Discussion of Numerical Python
On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 8:26
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Matthew Brett
>> wrote:
>> [...]
>>> I can't replicate the segfault with manylinux
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Matthew Brett
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> [...]
>> I can't replicate the segfault with manylinux wheels and scipy. On
>> the other hand, I get a new test error for numpy from
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:57 AM, Evgeni Burovski
wrote:
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Evgeni Burovski
> Date: Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:56 AM
> Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] Multi-distribution Linux wheels - please test
>
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:57 AM, Evgeni Burovski
> wrote:
>> -- Forwarded message --
>> From: Evgeni Burovski
>> Date: Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
[...]
> I can't replicate the segfault with manylinux wheels and scipy. On
> the other hand, I get a new test error for numpy from manylinux, scipy
> from manylinux, like this:
>
> $ python -c 'import scipy.linalg;
16 matches
Mail list logo