On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:17 PM, David Cournapeaucourn...@gmail.com wrote:
If possible, you should not build executables, it is not portable.
Compiling and linking is Ok, running is not. For a tool which is aimed
a general use, I think this is important. Knowing the exact tests
needed by the
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 9:05 AM, David
Cournapeauda...@ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp wrote:
Kurt Smith wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:17 PM, David Cournapeaucourn...@gmail.com wrote:
If possible, you should not build executables, it is not portable.
Compiling and linking is Ok, running is not.
Kurt Smith wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 9:05 AM, David
Cournapeauda...@ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp wrote:
Kurt Smith wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:17 PM, David Cournapeaucourn...@gmail.com
wrote:
If possible, you should not build executables, it is not portable.
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Kurt Smithkwmsm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Is there a way for numpy.distutils to compile a fortran source file
into an executable?
If the whole point of building the executable is to run it in order to
parse the output, then you can start with this:
$ cat
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Lisandro Dalcindalc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Kurt Smithkwmsm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Is there a way for numpy.distutils to compile a fortran source file
into an executable?
If the whole point of building the executable is to
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 3:41 AM, Lisandro Dalcindalc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Kurt Smithkwmsm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Is there a way for numpy.distutils to compile a fortran source file
into an executable?
If the whole point of building the executable is to
Hello,
I'm working under the able mentoring of Dag Sverre Seljebotn to
implement a GSoC project informally known as 'f2cy'. From the 10,000
meter view, f2cy will (1) wrap fortran 77/90/95 code into a python
module (reproducing f2py in this regard) with full support for
assumed-shape fortran
