On 24 February 2014 05:21, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
I've tentatively rewritten the first section of the PEP to try and
accomplish this framing:
https://github.com/njsmith/numpy/blob/matmul-pep/doc/neps/return-of-revenge-of-matmul-pep.rst
Comments welcome etc.
I've not been
23.02.2014 00:03, Nathaniel Smith kirjoitti:
Currently numpy's 'dot' acts a bit weird for ndim2 or ndim1. In
practice this doesn't usually matter much, because these are very
rarely used. But, I would like to nail down the behaviour so we can
say something precise in the matrix multiplication
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
23.02.2014 00:03, Nathaniel Smith kirjoitti:
Currently numpy's 'dot' acts a bit weird for ndim2 or ndim1. In
practice this doesn't usually matter much, because these are very
rarely used. But, I would like to nail down the
Hi all,
Currently numpy's 'dot' acts a bit weird for ndim2 or ndim1. In
practice this doesn't usually matter much, because these are very
rarely used. But, I would like to nail down the behaviour so we can
say something precise in the matrix multiplication PEP. So here's one
proposal.
# CURRENT:
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
Hi all,
Currently numpy's 'dot' acts a bit weird for ndim2 or ndim1. In
practice this doesn't usually matter much, because these are very
rarely used. But, I would like to nail down the behaviour so we can
say
On Feb 22, 2014 2:03 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
Hi all,
Currently numpy's 'dot' acts a bit weird for ndim2 or ndim1. In
practice this doesn't usually matter much, because these are very
rarely used. But, I would like to nail down the behaviour so we can
say something precise
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
The discussion might become confusing in the conflation of:
* backward incompatible changes to dot
* coherent behavior to propose in a PEP
Right, I definitely am asking about how we think the ideal dot
operator
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
Hi all,
Currently numpy's 'dot' acts a bit weird for ndim2 or ndim1. In
practice this doesn't usually matter much, because these are very
It would help me follow this discussion if it were broken up
into pieces:
- what is being asserted as first principles for `dot`
(e.g., what mathematical understanding)?
- to what extent do other important implementations
(e.g., Mathematica and Julia) deviate from the
proposed
23.02.2014 00:03, Nathaniel Smith kirjoitti:
Currently numpy's 'dot' acts a bit weird for ndim2 or ndim1. In
practice this doesn't usually matter much, because these are very
rarely used. But, I would like to nail down the behaviour so we can
say something precise in the matrix multiplication
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
23.02.2014 00:03, Nathaniel Smith kirjoitti:
Currently numpy's 'dot' acts a bit weird for ndim2 or ndim1. In
practice this doesn't usually matter much, because these are very
rarely used. But, I would like to nail down the
11 matches
Mail list logo
