The actual list of Yorick functions relevant here appears to be here:
http:// yorick.sourceforge.net/manual/yorick_46.php#SEC46
http:// yorick.sourceforge.net/manual/yorick_47.php#SEC47
I must say that I don't see many functions missing in Numpy...
David (Strozzi): are these the
Mon, 18 May 2009 09:21:39 -0700, David J Strozzi wrote:
[clip]
I also like pointing out that Yorick was a fast, free environment
developed by ~1990, when matlab/IDL were probably the only comparable
games in town, but very few people ever used it. I think this is a case
study in the triumph
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 13:23, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
Mon, 18 May 2009 09:21:39 -0700, David J Strozzi wrote:
[clip]
I also like pointing out that Yorick was a fast, free environment
developed by ~1990, when
Fri, 15 May 2009 16:09:08 -0400, David Huard wrote:
Can this indexing syntax do things that are otherwise awkward with the
current syntax ? Otherwise, I'm not warm to the idea of making indexing
more complex than it is.
I think the indexing with callables is more syntax sugar for nested
Pauli and David,
Can this indexing syntax do things that are otherwise awkward with the
current syntax ? Otherwise, I'm not warm to the idea of making indexing more
complex than it is.
getv : this is useful but it feels a bit redundant with numpy.take. Is there
a reason why take could not
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 4:09 PM, David Huard david.hu...@gmail.com wrote:
Pauli and David,
Can this indexing syntax do things that are otherwise awkward with the
current syntax ? Otherwise, I'm not warm to the idea of making indexing more
complex than it is.
getv : this is useful but it
Josef,
You're right, you can see it as a moving average. For 1D, correlate(a,
[5,.5]) yields what I expect but does not take an axis keyword. For the 2D
case, I'm rather looking for
ndimage.filters.correlate(b,0.25*np.ones((2,2)))[1:,1:]
So another one-liner... maybe not worth adding to the
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 5:39 PM, David Huard david.hu...@gmail.com wrote:
Josef,
You're right, you can see it as a moving average. For 1D, correlate(a,
[5,.5]) yields what I expect but does not take an axis keyword. For the 2D
case, I'm rather looking for
Wed, 13 May 2009 13:18:45 -0700, David J Strozzi kirjoitti:
[clip]
Many of you probably know of the interpreter yorick by Dave Munro. As a
Livermoron, I use it all the time. There are some built-in functions
there, analogous to but above and beyond numpy's sum() and diff(), which
are quite
