Re: [Numpy-discussion] Moving lib.recfunctions?

2011-07-06 Thread Dave Hirschfeld
Pierre GM pgmdevlist at gmail.com writes: Hello, The idea behin having a lib.recfunctions and not a rec.recfunctions or whatever was to illustrate that the functions of this package are more generic than they appear. They work with regular structured ndarrays and don't need recarrays.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Moving lib.recfunctions?

2011-07-05 Thread Skipper Seabold
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Skipper Seabold jsseab...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 2:22 PM,  josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Skipper Seabold jsseab...@gmail.com wrote: lib.recfunctions has never been fully advertised. The two bugs I just discovered

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Moving lib.recfunctions?

2011-07-05 Thread Pierre GM
On Jul 5, 2011, at 8:33 PM, Skipper Seabold wrote: On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Skipper Seabold jsseab...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 2:22 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Skipper Seabold jsseab...@gmail.com wrote: lib.recfunctions has never

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Moving lib.recfunctions?

2011-07-05 Thread Skipper Seabold
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Pierre GM pgmdevl...@gmail.com wrote: On Jul 5, 2011, at 8:33 PM, Skipper Seabold wrote: On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Skipper Seabold jsseab...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 2:22 PM,  josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 1:59 PM,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Moving lib.recfunctions?

2011-07-05 Thread Pierre GM
On Jul 5, 2011, at 9:23 PM, Skipper Seabold wrote: On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Pierre GM pgmdevl...@gmail.com wrote: ... Hello, The idea behin having a lib.recfunctions and not a rec.recfunctions or whatever was to illustrate that the functions of this package are more generic

[Numpy-discussion] Moving lib.recfunctions?

2011-07-01 Thread Skipper Seabold
lib.recfunctions has never been fully advertised. The two bugs I just discovered lead me to believe that it's not that well vetted, but it is useful. I can't be the only one using these? What do people think of either deprecating lib.recfunctions or at least importing them into the numpy.rec

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Moving lib.recfunctions?

2011-07-01 Thread josef . pktd
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Skipper Seabold jsseab...@gmail.com wrote: lib.recfunctions has never been fully advertised. The two bugs I just discovered lead me to believe that it's not that well vetted, but it is useful. I can't be the only one using these? What do people think of either

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Moving lib.recfunctions?

2011-07-01 Thread Skipper Seabold
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 2:22 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Skipper Seabold jsseab...@gmail.com wrote: lib.recfunctions has never been fully advertised. The two bugs I just discovered lead me to believe that it's not that well vetted, but it is useful. I can't

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Moving lib.recfunctions?

2011-07-01 Thread Benjamin Root
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Skipper Seabold jsseab...@gmail.comwrote: lib.recfunctions has never been fully advertised. The two bugs I just discovered lead me to believe that it's not that well vetted, but it is useful. I can't be the only one using these? Nope, you aren't the only one.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Moving lib.recfunctions?

2011-07-01 Thread Skipper Seabold
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote: On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Skipper Seabold jsseab...@gmail.com wrote: lib.recfunctions has never been fully advertised. The two bugs I just discovered lead me to believe that it's not that well vetted, but it is