Pierre GM pgmdevlist at gmail.com writes:
Hello,
The idea behin having a lib.recfunctions and not a rec.recfunctions or
whatever was to illustrate that the
functions of this package are more generic than they appear. They work with
regular structured ndarrays
and don't need recarrays.
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Skipper Seabold jsseab...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 2:22 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Skipper Seabold jsseab...@gmail.com wrote:
lib.recfunctions has never been fully advertised. The two bugs I just
discovered
On Jul 5, 2011, at 8:33 PM, Skipper Seabold wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Skipper Seabold jsseab...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 2:22 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Skipper Seabold jsseab...@gmail.com wrote:
lib.recfunctions has never
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Pierre GM pgmdevl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 5, 2011, at 8:33 PM, Skipper Seabold wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Skipper Seabold jsseab...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 2:22 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 1:59 PM,
On Jul 5, 2011, at 9:23 PM, Skipper Seabold wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Pierre GM pgmdevl...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Hello,
The idea behin having a lib.recfunctions and not a rec.recfunctions or
whatever was to illustrate that the functions of this package are more
generic
lib.recfunctions has never been fully advertised. The two bugs I just
discovered lead me to believe that it's not that well vetted, but it
is useful. I can't be the only one using these?
What do people think of either deprecating lib.recfunctions or at
least importing them into the numpy.rec
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Skipper Seabold jsseab...@gmail.com wrote:
lib.recfunctions has never been fully advertised. The two bugs I just
discovered lead me to believe that it's not that well vetted, but it
is useful. I can't be the only one using these?
What do people think of either
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 2:22 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Skipper Seabold jsseab...@gmail.com wrote:
lib.recfunctions has never been fully advertised. The two bugs I just
discovered lead me to believe that it's not that well vetted, but it
is useful. I can't
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Skipper Seabold jsseab...@gmail.comwrote:
lib.recfunctions has never been fully advertised. The two bugs I just
discovered lead me to believe that it's not that well vetted, but it
is useful. I can't be the only one using these?
Nope, you aren't the only one.
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Skipper Seabold jsseab...@gmail.com
wrote:
lib.recfunctions has never been fully advertised. The two bugs I just
discovered lead me to believe that it's not that well vetted, but it
is
10 matches
Mail list logo