Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.3.0 rc1 fails find_duplicates on Solaris

2009-03-31 Thread Mark Sienkiewicz
Pauli Virtanen wrote: Probably they are both related to unspecified sort order for the duplicates. There were some sort-order ignoring missing in the test. I think the test is now fixed in trunk: http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/changeset/6827 The test passes in 1.4.0.dev6827.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.3.0 rc1 fails find_duplicates on Solaris

2009-03-30 Thread Charles R Harris
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Mark Sienkiewicz sienk...@stsci.eduwrote: Numpy 1.3.0 rc1 fails this self-test on Solaris. == FAIL: Test find_duplicates

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.3.0 rc1 fails find_duplicates on Solaris

2009-03-30 Thread Mark Sienkiewicz
== FAIL: Test find_duplicates -- ... AssertionError: Arrays are not equal (mismatch 50.0%) x: array([(1, (2.0, 'B')), (2, (2.0, 'B')), (2, (2.0, 'B')),

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.3.0 rc1 fails find_duplicates on Solaris

2009-03-30 Thread Pauli Virtanen
Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:03:17 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote: On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Mark Sienkiewicz sienk...@stsci.eduwrote: Numpy 1.3.0 rc1 fails this self-test on Solaris. [clip] == FAIL: Test find_duplicates

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.3.0 rc1 fails find_duplicates on Solaris

2009-03-30 Thread Charles R Harris
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Mark Sienkiewicz sienk...@stsci.eduwrote: == FAIL: Test find_duplicates -- ... AssertionError: Arrays are not equal

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.3.0 rc1 fails find_duplicates on Solaris

2009-03-30 Thread Pauli Virtanen
Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:15:06 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote: I'm guessing that it is the test that needs fixing. And maybe the windows problem is related. Probably they are both related to unspecified sort order for the duplicates. There were some sort-order ignoring missing in the test. I think