Robert Cimrman <cimrman3 <at> ntc.zcu.cz> writes: > Hi Neil, > > This sounds good. If you don't have time to do it, I don't mind having > > a go at writing > > a patch to implement these changes (deprecate the existing unique1d, rename > > unique1d to unique and add the set approach from the old unique, and the other > > changes mentioned in http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/1133). > > That would be really great - I will not be online starting tomorrow till > the end of next week (more or less), so I can really look at the issue > after I return. >
Here's a patch that implements most of the changes suggested in the ticket, and merges unique and unique1d functionality to a single function unique in arraysetops: http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/1133 Please review it. Thanks, Neil _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion