On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 10:56 PM, David Cournapeau
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Charles R Harris wrote:
I'm also wondering about the sign ufunc. It should probably return nan
for nans, but -1,0,1 are the current values. We also need to decide
which end of the sorted values the nans should
On Friday 26 September 2008 08:29:02 Charles R Harris wrote:
It shouldn't be any more difficult to do either based on a keyword.
Argsorts shouldn't be a problem either. I'm thinking that the most flexible
way to handle the sorts is to make a preliminary pass through the data and
collect all
2008/9/26 David Cournapeau [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Charles R Harris wrote:
I'm also wondering about the sign ufunc. It should probably return nan
for nans, but -1,0,1 are the current values. We also need to decide
which end of the sorted values the nans should go to. I'm a bit
partial to the
Hi,
We started a small document to gather all information given in
previous threads about NaN handling in max and co in numpy. Thanks to
Anne (Archibald) for useful comments/additions/typo corrections:
http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/numpy/wiki/ProperNanHandling
We describe approaches taken
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 10:15 PM, David Cournapeau
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We started a small document to gather all information given in
previous threads about NaN handling in max and co in numpy. Thanks to
Anne (Archibald) for useful comments/additions/typo corrections:
Charles R Harris wrote:
I'm also wondering about the sign ufunc. It should probably return nan
for nans, but -1,0,1 are the current values. We also need to decide
which end of the sorted values the nans should go to. I'm a bit
partial to the beginning but the end would be fine with me, it
