On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On 11 Apr 2013 15:29, "Charles R Harris"
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 4:32 AM, Sebastian Berg <
> sebast...@sipsolutions.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 11:43 -0700, Charles R Harris wrote:
> >> > Hi All,
On 11 Apr 2013 15:29, "Charles R Harris" wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 4:32 AM, Sebastian Berg <
sebast...@sipsolutions.net> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 11:43 -0700, Charles R Harris wrote:
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>>
>>
>> > The development branch has been accumulating stuff since last
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 4:32 AM, Sebastian Berg
wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 11:43 -0700, Charles R Harris wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
>
>
> > The development branch has been accumulating stuff since last summer,
> > I suggest we look to get it out in May, branching at the end of this
> > month.
>
>
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Sebastian Berg
wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 11:43 -0700, Charles R Harris wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>
>
>> The development branch has been accumulating stuff since last summer,
>> I suggest we look to get it out in May, branching at the end of this
>> month.
>
> Hey
On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 11:43 -0700, Charles R Harris wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The development branch has been accumulating stuff since last summer,
> I suggest we look to get it out in May, branching at the end of this
> month.
Hey,
maybe it is a bit early, but I was wondering. What are the things
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
> I hope to finish the rest of issues for 1.7.1 today or tomorrow.
> Should I release 1.7.1rc1 first? I think that makes sense, just to be
> sure, right?
Big +1 to doing an RC from me.
I guess conceptually this is like we just jumped back in
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:52 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Charles R Harris
>> wrote:
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > There are now some 14 non-merge commits in the 1.7.x branch including
>> > the
>> > critical
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > There are now some 14 non-merge commits in the 1.7.x branch including the
> > critical diagonal leak fix. I think there is maybe one more critical
> > backport a
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> There are now some 14 non-merge commits in the 1.7.x branch including the
> critical diagonal leak fix. I think there is maybe one more critical
> backport and perhaps several low priority fixes, documentation and such, but
> I
Hi All,
There are now some 14 non-merge commits in the 1.7.x branch including the
critical diagonal leak fix. I think there is maybe one more critical
backport and perhaps several low priority fixes, documentation and such,
but I think we should start up the release process with a goal of getting
10 matches
Mail list logo