Re: [Numpy-discussion] Scheduling the 1.7.1 and 1.8 releases

2013-04-11 Thread Charles R Harris
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On 11 Apr 2013 15:29, "Charles R Harris" > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 4:32 AM, Sebastian Berg < > sebast...@sipsolutions.net> wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 11:43 -0700, Charles R Harris wrote: > >> > Hi All,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Scheduling the 1.7.1 and 1.8 releases

2013-04-11 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On 11 Apr 2013 15:29, "Charles R Harris" wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 4:32 AM, Sebastian Berg < sebast...@sipsolutions.net> wrote: >> >> On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 11:43 -0700, Charles R Harris wrote: >> > Hi All, >> > >> >> >> > The development branch has been accumulating stuff since last

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Scheduling the 1.7.1 and 1.8 releases

2013-04-11 Thread Charles R Harris
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 4:32 AM, Sebastian Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 11:43 -0700, Charles R Harris wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > > > The development branch has been accumulating stuff since last summer, > > I suggest we look to get it out in May, branching at the end of this > > month. > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Scheduling the 1.7.1 and 1.8 releases

2013-04-11 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Sebastian Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 11:43 -0700, Charles R Harris wrote: >> Hi All, >> > > >> The development branch has been accumulating stuff since last summer, >> I suggest we look to get it out in May, branching at the end of this >> month. > > Hey

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Scheduling the 1.7.1 and 1.8 releases

2013-04-11 Thread Sebastian Berg
On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 11:43 -0700, Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi All, > > The development branch has been accumulating stuff since last summer, > I suggest we look to get it out in May, branching at the end of this > month. Hey, maybe it is a bit early, but I was wondering. What are the things

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Scheduling the 1.7.1 and 1.8 releases

2013-03-08 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Ondřej Čertík wrote: > I hope to finish the rest of issues for 1.7.1 today or tomorrow. > Should I release 1.7.1rc1 first? I think that makes sense, just to be > sure, right? Big +1 to doing an RC from me. I guess conceptually this is like we just jumped back in

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Scheduling the 1.7.1 and 1.8 releases

2013-03-08 Thread Ondřej Čertík
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:52 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> >> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Charles R Harris >> wrote: >> > Hi All, >> > >> > There are now some 14 non-merge commits in the 1.7.x branch including >> > the >> > critical

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Scheduling the 1.7.1 and 1.8 releases

2013-03-06 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Charles R Harris > wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > There are now some 14 non-merge commits in the 1.7.x branch including the > > critical diagonal leak fix. I think there is maybe one more critical > > backport a

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Scheduling the 1.7.1 and 1.8 releases

2013-03-06 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi All, > > There are now some 14 non-merge commits in the 1.7.x branch including the > critical diagonal leak fix. I think there is maybe one more critical > backport and perhaps several low priority fixes, documentation and such, but > I

[Numpy-discussion] Scheduling the 1.7.1 and 1.8 releases

2013-03-06 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All, There are now some 14 non-merge commits in the 1.7.x branch including the critical diagonal leak fix. I think there is maybe one more critical backport and perhaps several low priority fixes, documentation and such, but I think we should start up the release process with a goal of getting