Re: [Numpy-discussion] StackOverflow documentation

2016-07-21 Thread josef . pktd
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > Thu, 21 Jul 2016 16:24:15 +0200, mail kirjoitti: > [clip] >> Since it is run by the community, perhaps it's not a bad idea to >> encourage people to share their examples. > > I would perhaps rather encourage people to improve

Re: [Numpy-discussion] StackOverflow documentation

2016-07-21 Thread Pauli Virtanen
Thu, 21 Jul 2016 16:24:15 +0200, mail kirjoitti: [clip] > Since it is run by the community, perhaps it's not a bad idea to > encourage people to share their examples. I would perhaps rather encourage people to improve the "Numpy User Guide" or the main documentation. Of course, working on that

Re: [Numpy-discussion] StackOverflow documentation

2016-07-21 Thread mail
>> StackOverflow now also has documentation, and there already is a NumPy tag: >> >> http://stackoverflow.com/documentation/numpy >> >> Not sure what, if anything, do we want to do with this, nor how to handle >> not having to different sources with the same information. Any thoughts? >From what

Re: [Numpy-discussion] StackOverflow documentation

2016-07-21 Thread Charles R Harris
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 5:47 AM, Jaime Fernández del Río < jaime.f...@gmail.com> wrote: > StackOverflow now also has documentation, and there already is a NumPy tag: > > http://stackoverflow.com/documentation/numpy > > Not sure what, if anything, do we want to do with this, nor how to handle >

[Numpy-discussion] StackOverflow documentation

2016-07-21 Thread Jaime Fernández del Río
StackOverflow now also has documentation, and there already is a NumPy tag: http://stackoverflow.com/documentation/numpy Not sure what, if anything, do we want to do with this, nor how to handle not having to different sources with the same information. Any thoughts? Jaime -- (\__/) ( O.o) (