On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Charles R
Harrischarlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
ERROR: test_nan_items (test_utils.TestApproxEqual)
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 9:37 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Charles R
Harrischarlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
ERROR: test_nan_items (test_utils.TestApproxEqual)
--
Traceback
Charles R Harris wrote:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 9:37 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com
mailto:courn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Charles R
Harrischarlesr.har...@gmail.com
mailto:charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
ERROR: test_nan_items
Charles R Harris wrote:
I'd just look at the difference and see if it exceeded some fraction
of the expected value. There is the problem of zero, which could be
handled in the usual way as diff abserr + relerr. I think abserr
would need to be a new keyword with a default value. Since the
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 10:48 PM, David Cournapeau
da...@ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp wrote:
Charles R Harris wrote:
I'd just look at the difference and see if it exceeded some fraction
of the expected value. There is the problem of zero, which could be
handled in the usual way as diff
