Re: [Numpy-discussion] Windows wheels, built, but should we deploy?

2016-03-08 Thread Olivier Grisel
Thanks Matthew! I just installed it and ran the tests and it all works (except for test_system_info.py that fails because I am missing a vcvarsall.bat on that system but this is expected). -- Olivier ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Windows wheels, built, but should we deploy?

2016-03-07 Thread Matthew Brett
On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 7:30 PM, wrote: >> [...] >>> AFAIK, numpy doesn't provide access to BLAS/LAPACK. scipy

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Windows wheels, built, but should we deploy?

2016-03-06 Thread Carl Kleffner
+1 from me. I could prepare scipy builds based on these numpy builds. Carl 2016-03-05 19:40 GMT+01:00 Matthew Brett : > Hi, > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 7:30 PM, wrote: > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Windows wheels, built, but should we deploy?

2016-03-05 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 7:30 PM, wrote: > [...] >> AFAIK, numpy doesn't provide access to BLAS/LAPACK. scipy does. statsmodels >> is linking to the installed BLAS/LAPACK in cython code through

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Windows wheels, built, but should we deploy?

2016-03-04 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 7:30 PM, wrote: [...] > AFAIK, numpy doesn't provide access to BLAS/LAPACK. scipy does. statsmodels > is linking to the installed BLAS/LAPACK in cython code through scipy. So far > we haven't seen problems with different versions. I think scipy

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Windows wheels, built, but should we deploy?

2016-03-04 Thread josef.pktd
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 12:29 AM, David Cournapeau > wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 4:42 AM, Matthew Brett > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> Summary: > >> >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Windows wheels, built, but should we deploy?

2016-03-04 Thread Chris Barker
+1 -- thanks for doing all this work. There is a HUGE amount you can do with numpy that doesn't give a whit about how fast .dot() et all are. If you really do need that to be fast as possible, you can pug in a faster build later. This is great. Just as one example -- I teach a general python

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Windows wheels, built, but should we deploy?

2016-03-04 Thread Matthew Brett
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 12:29 AM, David Cournapeau wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 4:42 AM, Matthew Brett > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Summary: >> >> I propose that we upload Windows wheels to pypi. The wheels are >> likely to be stable and relatively

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Windows wheels, built, but should we deploy?

2016-03-04 Thread David Cournapeau
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 4:42 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > Summary: > > I propose that we upload Windows wheels to pypi. The wheels are > likely to be stable and relatively easy to maintain, but will have > slower performance than other versions of numpy linked

[Numpy-discussion] Windows wheels, built, but should we deploy?

2016-03-03 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, Summary: I propose that we upload Windows wheels to pypi. The wheels are likely to be stable and relatively easy to maintain, but will have slower performance than other versions of numpy linked against faster BLAS / LAPACK libraries. Background: There's a long discussion going on at