Jarrod Millman wrote:
Hello,
..
Please let me know if you have any major objections to adopting the
Python class naming convention.
I don't object.
Once we have agreed to using CapWords for classes, we will need to
decide what to do about our existing class names. Obviously, it is
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 09:12:43AM +0200, Pearu Peterson wrote:
Jarrod Millman wrote:
Hello,
..
Please let me know if you have any major objections to adopting the
Python class naming convention.
I don't object.
Me either.
2. Any one adding a new class to NumPy would use
Pearu Peterson wrote:
..
After fixing the class names in tests then how many classes use
camelcase style in numpy/distutils? How many of them are implementation
.. ^^^
Btw, I meant numpy/scipy here.
Pearu
___
Jarrod Millman wrote:
I am hoping that most of you agree with the general principle of
bringing NumPy and SciPy into compliance with the standard naming
conventions.
+1
3. When we release NumPy 1.1, we will convert all (or almost all)
class names to CapWords.
What's the
On 10/2/07, Christopher Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jarrod Millman wrote:
I am hoping that most of you agree with the general principle of
bringing NumPy and SciPy into compliance with the standard naming
conventions.
Excellent plan - and I think it will make the code considerably more
Matthew Brett wrote:
On 10/2/07, Christopher Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is a class in this case -- with new-style classes, there is no
distinction between types and classes, so I guess they are all classes,
which means lots of things like:
numpy.float32
etc. etc. etc. are
On 10/2/07, Christopher Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jarrod Millman wrote:
I am hoping that most of you agree with the general principle of
bringing NumPy and SciPy into compliance with the standard naming
conventions.
+1
3. When we release NumPy 1.1, we will convert all (or
A Tuesday 02 October 2007, Robert Kern escrigué:
Matthew Brett wrote:
On 10/2/07, Christopher Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is a class in this case -- with new-style classes, there is
no distinction between types and classes, so I guess they are all
classes, which means lots of
A Tuesday 02 October 2007, Timothy Hochberg escrigué:
One approach would be CapWords the superclasses of these that are
subclassable, but leave the leaf types alone. For example, looking at
float32 and its bases :
- numpy.generic - numpy.Generic
- numpy.number - numpy.Number
-
Hello,
NumPy and SciPy should conform with Guido's style guide as closely as possible:
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/
The only serious divergence that I am aware of between the NumPy and
SciPy codebase and the Python recommended standards is in class
naming. According to Guido, class
10 matches
Mail list logo
