(we hashed this out on IRC, but replying here for the sake of
recording it)
On 5-Dec-09, at 9:04 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
Can you try to change linalg/setup.py so that it *only* includes
lapack_litemodule.c in the build?
Yup; it turns out it wasn't NumPy's lapack_lite calling dlamc3_ but
On 29-Nov-09, at 4:46 PM, David Warde-Farley wrote:
On 27-Nov-09, at 6:29 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
3.9.12 segfaulted on me while running, so I haven't bothered with
versions after that. Why not try the stable version 3.8.3?
Just to follow up, I went back to 3.9.11 and numpy works
la, 2009-12-05 kello 20:27 -0500, David Warde-Farley kirjoitti:
[clip]
I've briefly been trying to figure out how to work around this, but
I'm a bit confused. I was under the (mistaken?) impression that the
f2c'd code in dlapack_lite.c, zlapack_lite.c and dlamch.c was only
used in the
On 27-Nov-09, at 6:29 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
3.9.12 segfaulted on me while running, so I haven't bothered with
versions after that. Why not try the stable version 3.8.3?
Just to follow up, I went back to 3.9.11 and numpy works without
incident, using the exact same ATLAS build
On 26-Nov-09, at 8:56 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
I never had luck with the netlib-lapack-tarfile=file
option, it didn't build lapack correctly. Try doing them separately.
I just tried that.
-Ss flapack path/to/lapack_LINUX.a didn't seem to build a proper
LAPACK (it was missing all sorts of
On 27-Nov-09, at 5:02 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
What version of ATLAS?
3.9.17, the latest development branch version. At some point in the
changelog the author mentions he removed other methods building with
LAPACK, leaving only the tarfile one. I'm giving the entire build
another try
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 4:18 PM, David Warde-Farley d...@cs.toronto.eduwrote:
On 27-Nov-09, at 5:02 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
What version of ATLAS?
3.9.17, the latest development branch version. At some point in the
3.9.12 segfaulted on me while running, so I haven't bothered with
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 4:18 PM, David Warde-Farley d...@cs.toronto.edu
wrote:
On 27-Nov-09, at 5:02 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
What version of ATLAS?
3.9.17, the latest development branch version. At
On 27-Nov-09, at 7:49 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
I guess because of the updated threading support.
Right you are; the 3.9 series is rather faster I find, at least in
parallel.
I think the solution is to simply bypass the atlas mechanism to build
lapack, and do it manually.
Tried that...
It seems like I've done this enough times on enough machines but I'm
still running into problems...
After installing what I'm pretty sure is a complete ATLAS+LAPACK and
building numpy against it (appropriately editing site.cfg, etc.) I'm
faced with this when building numpy-1.3.0:
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 6:53 PM, David Warde-Farley d...@cs.toronto.eduwrote:
It seems like I've done this enough times on enough machines but I'm
still running into problems...
After installing what I'm pretty sure is a complete ATLAS+LAPACK and
building numpy against it (appropriately
11 matches
Mail list logo
