bincount([]) makes no sense, but if a minlength argument is provided,
then the routine should succeed.
It fails in 1.6.1, has it been fixed in master?
- James
--
http://www-etud.iro.umontreal.ca/~bergstrj
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
On 2/25/2012 4:44 PM, James Bergstra wrote:
bincount([]) makes no sense,
I disagree:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.numeric.general/42041
but if a minlength argument is provided,
then the routine should succeed.
Definitely!
Alan Isaac
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Alan G Isaac alan.is...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/25/2012 4:44 PM, James Bergstra wrote:
bincount([]) makes no sense,
I disagree:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.numeric.general/42041
but if a minlength argument is provided,
then the routine
On Saturday, February 25, 2012, Alan G Isaac wrote:
On 2/25/2012 4:44 PM, James Bergstra wrote:
bincount([]) makes no sense,
I disagree:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.numeric.general/42041
but if a minlength argument is provided,
then the routine should succeed.
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Alan G Isaac alan.is...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/25/2012 4:44 PM, James Bergstra wrote:
bincount([]) makes no sense,
I disagree:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.numeric.general/42041
gmane is down to me at the moment, but if this argues that the