Well I see it works, however with one change: the %apply typemaps need
to be done before %include'ing the header file, or else nothing in
that header file will automatically get typemapped (only the functions
that are written using %inline will be typemapped, which in the case
of the exampe you
Hello again!
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 7:11 AM, Rich E reakina...@gmail.com wrote:
Well I see it works, however with one change: the %apply typemaps need
to be done before %include'ing the header file, or else nothing in
that header file will automatically get typemapped (only the functions
Here is my example, trying to wrap the function sms_spectrumMag that
we have been dealing with:
%apply (int DIM1, float* IN_ARRAY1) {(int sizeInArray, float* pInArray)};
%apply (int DIM1, float* INPLACE_ARRAY1) {(int sizeOutArray, float* pOutArray)};
%inline %{
void my_spectrumMag( int
2009/1/6 Rich E reakina...@gmail.com:
This helped immensely. I feel like I am getting close to being able
to accomplish what I would like with SWIG: producing a python module
that can be very 'python-like', while co-existing with the c library
that is very 'c-like'.
There is one question
Egor,
Thanks for the help. I think I want to leave the C code as-is
however, as it is perfectly fine there no knowing 'sizeOutMag' because
it can deduce both array sizes from one variable. There are many
other similar cases in my code (many where the size of the array is
known by a member of a
Hi list,
My question has to do with the Numpy/SWIG typemapping system.
I recently got the typemaps in numpy.i to work on most of my C
functions that are wrapped using SWIG, if they have arguments of the
form (int sizeArray, float *pArray).
Now I am trying to figure out how to wrap function that
