On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Julian Taylor
jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 23.02.2015 08:52, Jaime Fernández del Río wrote:
This was raised in SO today:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/28663142/why-is-np-wheres-result-read-only-for-multi-dimensional-arrays/28664009
On 23.02.2015 08:52, Jaime Fernández del Río wrote:
This was raised in SO today:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/28663142/why-is-np-wheres-result-read-only-for-multi-dimensional-arrays/28664009
np.nonzero (and np.where for boolean arrays) behave differently for 1-D
and higher
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Jaime Fernández del Río
jaime.f...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Julian Taylor
jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 23.02.2015 08:52, Jaime Fernández del Río wrote:
This was raised in SO today:
This was raised in SO today:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/28663142/why-is-np-wheres-result-read-only-for-multi-dimensional-arrays/28664009
np.nonzero (and np.where for boolean arrays) behave differently for 1-D and
higher dimensional arrays:
In the first case, a tuple with a single