Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy.random.poisson docs missing "Returns"

2010-06-27 Thread David Goldsmith
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 3:44 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > Sat, 26 Jun 2010 17:37:22 -0700, David Goldsmith wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 3:22 PM, wrote: > [clip] > >> Is there a chance that some changes got lost? > > > > (Almost) anything's possible... :-( > > There's practically no change o

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy.random.poisson docs missing "Returns"

2010-06-27 Thread Pauli Virtanen
Sat, 26 Jun 2010 17:37:22 -0700, David Goldsmith wrote: > On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 3:22 PM, wrote: [clip] >> Is there a chance that some changes got lost? > > (Almost) anything's possible... :-( There's practically no change of edits getting lost. There's a change of them being hidden if things a

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy.random.poisson docs missing "Returns"

2010-06-26 Thread David Goldsmith
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 3:22 PM, wrote: > On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 6:11 PM, David Goldsmith > wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 3:03 PM, wrote: > >> > >> On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 5:56 PM, David Goldsmith > >> wrote: > >> > Something is systematically wrong if there are this many problems in > t

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy.random.poisson docs missing "Returns"

2010-06-26 Thread David Goldsmith
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Vincent Davis wrote: > On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 4:22 PM, wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 6:11 PM, David Goldsmith > > wrote: > >> On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 3:03 PM, wrote: > >>> > >>> On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 5:56 PM, David Goldsmith > >>> wrote: > >>> > Someth

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy.random.poisson docs missing "Returns"

2010-06-26 Thread Vincent Davis
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 4:22 PM, wrote: > On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 6:11 PM, David Goldsmith > wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 3:03 PM, wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 5:56 PM, David Goldsmith >>> wrote: >>> > Something is systematically wrong if there are this many problems in the >>>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy.random.poisson docs missing "Returns"

2010-06-26 Thread josef . pktd
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 6:11 PM, David Goldsmith wrote: > On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 3:03 PM, wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 5:56 PM, David Goldsmith >> wrote: >> > Something is systematically wrong if there are this many problems in the >> > numpy.stats docstrings: numpy is supposed to be (w

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy.random.poisson docs missing "Returns"

2010-06-26 Thread David Goldsmith
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 3:03 PM, wrote: > On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 5:56 PM, David Goldsmith > wrote: > > Something is systematically wrong if there are this many problems in the > > numpy.stats docstrings: numpy is supposed to be (was) almost completely > > ready for review; please focus on scipy

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy.random.poisson docs missing "Returns"

2010-06-26 Thread Vincent Davis
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 3:56 PM, David Goldsmith wrote: > Something is systematically wrong if there are this many problems in the > numpy.stats docstrings: numpy is supposed to be (was) almost completely > ready for review; please focus on scipy unless/until the reason why there > are now so many

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy.random.poisson docs missing "Returns"

2010-06-26 Thread josef . pktd
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 5:56 PM, David Goldsmith wrote: > Something is systematically wrong if there are this many problems in the > numpy.stats docstrings: numpy is supposed to be (was) almost completely > ready for review; please focus on scipy unless/until the reason why there > are now so many

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy.random.poisson docs missing "Returns"

2010-06-26 Thread David Goldsmith
Something is systematically wrong if there are this many problems in the numpy.stats docstrings: numpy is supposed to be (was) almost completely ready for review; please focus on scipy unless/until the reason why there are now so many problems in numpy.stats can be determined (I suspect the numpy.s

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy.random.poisson docs missing "Returns"

2010-06-26 Thread josef . pktd
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Vincent Davis wrote: > numpy.random.poisson docs missing "Returns" > http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/generated/numpy.random.poisson.html#numpy.random.poisson You could just copy a generic Returns section to all of these. They all return a sample (array o

[Numpy-discussion] numpy.random.poisson docs missing "Returns"

2010-06-26 Thread Vincent Davis
numpy.random.poisson docs missing "Returns" http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/generated/numpy.random.poisson.html#numpy.random.poisson ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discus