On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Sebastian Berg wrote:
> Maybe a strict matrix product would make sense too, but the dot function
> behavior cannot be changed in any case, so its pointless to argue about
> it. Just make sure your arrays are 2-d (or matrices) if you want a
> matrix product, which
On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 11:11 -0500, Skipper Seabold wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Sebastian Berg
> wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 13:54 -0500, Skipper Seabold wrote:
> > I discovered this because scipy.optimize.fmin_powell appears
> to
> > squeeze 1d arg
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Sebastian Berg wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 13:54 -0500, Skipper Seabold wrote:
> > I discovered this because scipy.optimize.fmin_powell appears to
> > squeeze 1d argmin to 0d unlike the other optimizers, but that's a
> > different story.
> >
> >
> > I would ex
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 13:54 -0500, Skipper Seabold wrote:
> I discovered this because scipy.optimize.fmin_powell appears to
> squeeze 1d argmin to 0d unlike the other optimizers, but that's a
> different story.
>
>
> I would expect the 0d array to behave like the 1d array not the 2d as
> it does
I discovered this because scipy.optimize.fmin_powell appears to squeeze 1d
argmin to 0d unlike the other optimizers, but that's a different story.
I would expect the 0d array to behave like the 1d array not the 2d as it
does below. Thoughts? Maybe too big of a pain to change this behavior if
indee
