Ah,
To answer my own question:
Suggestion 1:
Wrap the .sort method call in a tiny python wrapper of the form:
def sort(self, axis=-1, kind='quicksort', order=None):
if axis=None:
_c_sort(self.ravel(), axis, kind, order)
else:
_c_sort(self, axis, kind, order)
I guess
Hi,
Is it possible, in fact, to do an inplace sort on an array with
axis=None (ie flat sort)?
Should the sort method have its docstring changed to reflect the fact
that axis=None is not valid?
Sorry to press on, but it would be good to resolve this somehow.
Is there some reason not to:
On Feb 13, 2008 1:52 PM, Matthew Brett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah,
To answer my own question:
Suggestion 1:
Wrap the .sort method call in a tiny python wrapper of the form:
def sort(self, axis=-1, kind='quicksort', order=None):
if axis=None:
_c_sort(self.ravel(), axis,
On 12/02/2008, Matthew Brett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible, in fact, to do an inplace sort on an array with
axis=None (ie flat sort)?
It is, sometimes; just make an array object to point to the flattened
version and sort that:
In [16]: b = a[:]
In [17]: b.shape = (16,)
In [18]:
On 12/02/2008, Anne Archibald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An efficient way to handle in-place (or out-of-place, come to think of
it) median along multiple axes is actually to take medians along all
axes in succession. That saves you some sorting effort, and some
programming effort, and doesn't
Hi,
To rephrase:
Is it possible, in fact, to do an inplace sort on an array with
axis=None (ie flat sort)?
Should the sort method have its docstring changed to reflect the fact
that axis=None is not valid?
Matthew
On Feb 10, 2008 7:50 PM, Matthew Brett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I just
