On 05/03/2012 06:27 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
On May 2, 2012, at 10:03 PM, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Travis Oliphanttra...@continuum.io wrote:
The only new principle (which is not strictly new --- but new to NumPy's
world-view) is using one (or more)
On 05/03/2012 03:25 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
On May 2, 2012, at 5:28 PM, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Francesc Altedfranc...@continuum.io wrote:
On 5/2/12 4:07 PM, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
Well, as the OP said, coo_matrix does not support dimensions larger
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:44 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
This coordinate format is also what's used by the MATLAB Tensor
Toolbox. They have a paper justifying this choice and describing some
tricks
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:41 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:44 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
This coordinate format is also what's used by the MATLAB Tensor
Hi all,
I'm currently writing a code that needs three dimensional data (for the
physicists it's dimensions are atom, ion, level). The problem is that not all
combinations do exist (a sparse array). Sparse matrices in scipy only deal with
two dimensions. The operations that I need to do on
what about numpy.ma? Those are marked array. But they won't be the fastest.
Fred
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Wolfgang Kerzendorf
wkerzend...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm currently writing a code that needs three dimensional data (for the
physicists it's dimensions are atom, ion,
On 5/2/12 11:16 AM, Wolfgang Kerzendorf wrote:
Hi all,
I'm currently writing a code that needs three dimensional data (for the
physicists it's dimensions are atom, ion, level). The problem is that not all
combinations do exist (a sparse array). Sparse matrices in scipy only deal
with two
Hi Francesc
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Francesc Alted franc...@continuum.io wrote:
and add another one for the actual values of the array. For a 3-D
sparse array, this looks like:
dim0 | dim1 | dim2 | value
==
0 | 0 | 0 | val0
0 | 10 | 100 |
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Francesc Alted franc...@continuum.io wrote:
On 5/2/12 11:16 AM, Wolfgang Kerzendorf wrote:
Hi all,
I'm currently writing a code that needs three dimensional data (for the
physicists it's dimensions are atom, ion, level). The problem is that not
all
On 5/2/12 4:07 PM, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
Hi Francesc
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Francesc Altedfranc...@continuum.io wrote:
and add another one for the actual values of the array. For a 3-D
sparse array, this looks like:
dim0 | dim1 | dim2 | value
==
On 5/2/12 4:20 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Francesc Altedfranc...@continuum.io wrote:
On 5/2/12 11:16 AM, Wolfgang Kerzendorf wrote:
Hi all,
I'm currently writing a code that needs three dimensional data (for the
physicists it's dimensions are atom, ion,
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Francesc Alted franc...@continuum.io wrote:
On 5/2/12 4:07 PM, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
Well, as the OP said, coo_matrix does not support dimensions larger than
2, right?
That's just an implementation detail, I would imagine--I'm trying to
figure out if there
On 5/2/12 5:28 PM, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Francesc Altedfranc...@continuum.io wrote:
On 5/2/12 4:07 PM, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
Well, as the OP said, coo_matrix does not support dimensions larger than
2, right?
That's just an implementation detail, I
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:26 PM, Francesc Alted franc...@continuum.io wrote:
On 5/2/12 4:20 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Francesc Altedfranc...@continuum.io wrote:
On 5/2/12 11:16 AM, Wolfgang Kerzendorf wrote:
Hi all,
I'm currently writing a code that needs
On May 2, 2012, at 5:28 PM, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Francesc Alted franc...@continuum.io wrote:
On 5/2/12 4:07 PM, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
Well, as the OP said, coo_matrix does not support dimensions larger than
2, right?
That's just an implementation
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
The only new principle (which is not strictly new --- but new to NumPy's
world-view) is using one (or more) fields of a structured array as synthetic
dimensions which replace 1 or more of the raw table dimensions.
Ah,
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Francesc Alted franc...@continuum.io
wrote:
On 5/2/12 11:16 AM, Wolfgang Kerzendorf wrote:
Hi all,
I'm currently writing a code that needs three dimensional data (for the
physicists
On May 2, 2012, at 10:03 PM, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
The only new principle (which is not strictly new --- but new to NumPy's
world-view) is using one (or more) fields of a structured array as
synthetic
18 matches
Mail list logo
