:
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 16:04:36 -0500
From: Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu
Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] Clarifications in numpy.ma module
To: Discussion of Numerical Python numpy-discussion@scipy.org
Message-ID:
CANNq6Fk4XTMcXeb64C9FWWnjWsVVK=Ri7CsGLsbE2wr=z-r...@mail.gmail.com
Guys,
sorry for the incomplete message,
*_DomainedBinaryOperation *for divide remainder
Related to issue 5354, where the docstring for _*MaskedBinaryOperation *says
that invalid values are pre-masked*, but for **_DomainedBinaryOperation *where
the invalid values are masked in result, even if
What do you mean that the mean function doesn't take care of the case where
the array is empty? In the example you provided, they both end up being
NaN, which is exactly correct.
Ben Root
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 6:10 AM, Maniteja Nandana
maniteja.modesty...@gmail.com wrote:
Guys,
sorry for
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
What do you mean that the mean function doesn't take care of the case
where the array is empty? In the example you provided, they both end up
being NaN, which is exactly correct.
Operations on masked arrays should not
Where does it say that operations on masked arrays should not produce NaNs?
Operations on masked arrays should ignore masked data. If I have NaNs in my
masked array, but are not masked out for some reason, I expect it to give
me NaNs. The mask is not the same as NaNs. Having np.mean([]) return the
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
Where does it say that operations on masked arrays should not produce NaNs?
Masked arrays were invented with the specific goal to avoid carrying NaNs
in computations. Back in the days, NaNs were not available on some
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Alexander Belopolsky ndar...@mac.com
wrote:
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
Where does it say that operations on masked arrays should not produce
NaNs?
Masked arrays were invented with the specific goal to avoid
I was just referring to the exception raised in the case where the length
of the array is zero. I have not thought if the example provided by
@Alexander.
I was also wondering if the automatic masking of NaN should be done or not,
which is why I asked about the difference in the operating named
exception? Did you mean warning? If warning, I recall some discussion
recently to figure out a way to hide that, but only for masked values (I
would want to see the warning if I do bad calculations in the unmasked
portions of my array).
Now I see your point 3 much more clearly. I had never
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
exception? Did you mean warning? If warning, I recall some discussion
recently to figure out a way to hide that, but only for masked values (I
would want to see the warning if I do bad calculations in the unmasked
portions
On 31-Dec-2014 4:53 am, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
exception? Did you mean warning? If warning, I recall some discussion
recently to figure out a way to hide that, but only for masked values (I
would want to
Maniteja,
Careful with advertising that you are reading up on any under-maintained
codebases. I did that for mplot3d four years ago and the previous
maintainer said tag! you're it!
I haven't been able to tag anyone since then...
Cheers!
Ben Root
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Maniteja
12 matches
Mail list logo
