Hi Julian,
to distinguish between mingw32 and mingw-w64 we need something like this:
#include stdlib.h
if !defined(HAVE_EXPM1) || defined(__MINGW64_VERSION_MAJOR)
instead of
if !defined(HAVE_EXPM1) || defined(__MINGW32__)
the latter is true for both: mingw32 and mingw-w64. I guess the mingw32
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:34 AM, Julian Taylor
jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 4:30 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
It looks as though mingw-w64 is at fault, and I was confused (still
am) because of the different behavior with double and a
On 23.04.2014 21:25, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:34 AM, Julian Taylor
jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 4:30 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
It looks as though mingw-w64 is at fault, and I was confused (still
am)
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Julian Taylor
jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 23.04.2014 21:25, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:34 AM, Julian Taylor
jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 4:30 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 4:30 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
It looks as though mingw-w64 is at fault, and I was confused (still
am) because of the different behavior with double and a constant:
#include stdio.h
#include math.h
int main() {
double z, i = -0.0;
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
With Carl Kleffner, I am trying to build a numpy 1.8.1 wheel for
Windows 64-bit, and latest stable ATLAS.
It works fine, apart from the following test failure:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Warren Weckesser
warren.weckes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
With Carl Kleffner, I am trying to build a numpy 1.8.1 wheel for
Windows 64-bit, and latest stable ATLAS.
It works
On Monday, April 14, 2014, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Warren Weckesser
warren.weckes...@gmail.com javascript:; wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Matthew Brett
matthew.br...@gmail.comjavascript:;
wrote:
Hi,
With
Hi,
mingw has expm1. Is this function suitable?
Regards
Carl
2014-04-14 21:34 GMT+02:00 Eric Moore e...@redtetrahedron.org:
On Monday, April 14, 2014, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Warren Weckesser
warren.weckes...@gmail.com
The official numpy mingw binaries do not have all these math issues.
Only the VC builds do.
As mingw is fine the functions must be somewhere in the windows API but
no-one has contributed a fix for the VC builds to numpy yet.
On 14.04.2014 22:43, Carl Kleffner wrote:
Hi,
mingw has expm1. Is
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Julian Taylor
jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
The official numpy mingw binaries do not have all these math issues.
Only the VC builds do.
As mingw is fine the functions must be somewhere in the windows API but
no-one has contributed a fix for the VC
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Julian Taylor
jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
The official numpy mingw binaries do not have all these math issues.
Only the VC builds do.
As mingw is fine the functions
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Julian Taylor
jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
The official numpy mingw binaries do not have all these math issues.
Only the VC builds do.
As mingw is fine the functions must be somewhere in the windows API but
no-one has contributed a fix for the VC
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Julian Taylor
jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
The official numpy mingw
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:02
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:58 PM,
16 matches
Mail list logo
