Hi,
I'm glad to inform you about new release 0.38 (2012-March-15):
OpenOpt:
interalg can handle discrete variables (see MINLP for examples)
interalg can handle multiobjective problems (MOP)
interalg can handle problems with parameters fixedVars/freeVars
Many interalg improvements and some
Le 09/03/2012 23:57, Ralf Gommers a écrit :
The buildbot doesn't check the doc build. I've edited a few of the links.
Thanks for checking !
I had not realized that simply using the `numpy.package` notation was
enough to get a link to the package.
Best,
Pierre
signature.asc
Description:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Asher Langton lang...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a followup to my post from January
(http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2012-January/059801.html)
and the panel discussion at PyData this weekend. As a few people have
suggested, a better approach than
Hello,
From the masked_values() documentation -
http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/generated/numpy.ma.masked_values.html
I10 np.ma.masked_values(x, 1.5)
O10
masked_array(data = [ 1. 1.1 2. 1.1 3. ],
mask = False,
fill_value = 1.5)
I12 np.ma.masked_values(x,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Gökhan Sever gokhanse...@gmail.comwrote:
If not so, how can I return a set of False values if my masking condition
is not met?
Self-answer: I can force the mask to be filled with False's, however unsure
if this is a safe operation.
I50 x = np.array([1, 1.1,
Ciao Gökhan,
AFAIR, shrink is used only to force a collapse of a mask full of False, not
to force the creation of such a mask.
Now, it should work as you expected, meaning that it needs to be fixed.
Could you open a ticket? And put me in copy, just in case.
Anyhow:
Your trick is a tad dangerous,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Pierre GM pgmdevl...@gmail.com wrote:
Ciao Gökhan,
AFAIR, shrink is used only to force a collapse of a mask full of False,
not to force the creation of such a mask.
Now, it should work as you expected, meaning that it needs to be fixed.
Could you open a
Submitted the ticket at http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/2082
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Gökhan Sever gokhanse...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Pierre GM pgmdevl...@gmail.com wrote:
Ciao Gökhan,
AFAIR, shrink is used only to force a collapse of a mask full
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Bryan Van de Ven bry...@continuum.io
wrote:
Hi all,
I have started working on a NEP for adding an enumerated type to NumPy.
It is on my GitHub:
On my machines anyway.
Running from numpy source directory.
non-existing path in 'numpy/distutils': 'site.cfg'
F2PY Version 2
numpy/core/setup_common.py:86: MismatchCAPIWarning: API mismatch detected,
the C API version numbers have to be updated. Current C api version is 6,
with checksum
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I noticed a casting change running the test suite on our image reader,
nibabel:
Hi Chuck,
I think I let my frustration get the better of me, and the message
below is too confrontational. I apologize.
I truly would like to understand where you're coming from on this,
though, so I'll try to make this more productive. My summary of points
that no-one has disagreed with yet is
On Thursday, March 15, 2012, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Bryan Van de Ven bry...@continuum.io
wrote:
Hi all,
I have started working on a NEP for adding an enumerated type to NumPy.
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
I'm not sure what it would even mean to treat this kind of data as
flags, since you can't take the bitwise-or of two strings...
This makes a more sense outside of ndarrays, where you would do something like:
enum FLAG0 = 1,
Hi,
Am I right in thinking that float96 on windows 32 bit is a float64
padded to 96 bits? If so, is it useful? Has anyone got a windows64
box to check float128 ?
Python 2.7.1 (r271:86832, Nov 27 2010, 18:30:46) [MSC v.1500 32 bit
(Intel)] on win32
Type help, copyright, credits or license for
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
Am I right in thinking that float96 on windows 32 bit is a float64
padded to 96 bits?
Yes
If so, is it useful?
Yes: this is what allows you to use dtype to parse complex binary files
directly in numpy
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:17 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Matthew Brett
matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
Am I right in thinking that float96 on windows 32 bit is a float64
padded to 96 bits?
Yes
If so, is it useful?
Yes:
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 9:17 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Am I right in thinking that float96 on windows 32 bit is a float64
padded to 96 bits?
Yes
If so, is it useful?
Yes:
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:17 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Am I right in thinking that float96
I just happened to have an xp64 VM running:
My version of numpy (1.6.1) does not have float128 (see more below what I
get in ipython session).
If you need to test something else please let me know.
Val
---
Enthought Python Distribution -- www.enthought.com
Python 2.7.2 |EPD 7.2-2 (64-bit)|
On Thursday, March 15, 2012, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:17 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Am I right in thinking that float96 on windows 32
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Val Kalatsky kalat...@gmail.com wrote:
I just happened to have an xp64 VM running:
My version of numpy (1.6.1) does not have float128 (see more below what I
get in ipython session).
If you need to test something else please let me know.
Thanks a lot -
I does look like a joke.
Here is print np.finfo(np.longdouble)
In [2]: np.__version__
Out[2]: '1.6.1'
In [3]: np.flo
np.floatnp.float32 np.float_ np.floor
np.float16 np.float64 np.floating np.floor_divide
In [3]: print np.finfo(np.longdouble)
Machine parameters
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:41 PM, Val Kalatsky kalat...@gmail.com wrote:
I does look like a joke.
Here is print np.finfo(np.longdouble)
In [2]: np.__version__
Out[2]: '1.6.1'
In [3]: np.flo
np.floatnp.float32 np.float_ np.floor
np.float16 np.float64
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Val Kalatsky kalat...@gmail.com wrote:
I does look like a joke.
Here is print np.finfo(np.longdouble)
In [2]: np.__version__
Out[2]: '1.6.1'
In [3]: np.flo
np.float np.float32 np.float_ np.floor
np.float16 np.float64
I'm seeing the same thing on both (64 and 32-bit) Windows
EPD test machines. I guess Windows does not support 128
bit floats.
I did some tests a few weeks ago, and discovered that also
on the Mac and Linux long long double is not really 128 bits.
If I remember correctly it was 80 bits: 1 (sign) +
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Ilan Schnell ischn...@enthought.com wrote:
I'm seeing the same thing on both (64 and 32-bit) Windows
EPD test machines. I guess Windows does not support 128
bit floats.
Do you mean there is no float96 on windows 32 bit as I described at
the beginning of
To be more precise. On both 32-bit and 64-bit Windows
machines I don't see.float96 as well as np.float128
- Ilan
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Ilan Schnell ischn...@enthought.com wrote:
I'm seeing the
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Ilan Schnell ischn...@enthought.com wrote:
To be more precise. On both 32-bit and 64-bit Windows
machines I don't see.float96 as well as np.float128
Do you have any idea why I am seeing float96 and you are not? I'm on
XP with the current sourceforge
29 matches
Mail list logo