Hi,
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Andre Martel soucoupevola...@yahoo.comwrote:
What would be the best way to remove the maximum from a cube and
collapse the remaining elements along the z-axis ?
For example, I want to reduce Cube to NewCube:
Cube
array([[[ 13, 2, 3, 42],
On 21. apr. 2012, at 00:16, Drew Frank wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
Oh, right. I was thinking small as in fits in L2 cache, not small as
in a few
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Given the amount of new
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 8:04 PM,
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 2:46 AM,
Hello,
this is a reminder of the approaching deadline for abstract submission at
the Euroscipy 2012 conference: the deadline is April 30, in one week.
Euroscipy 2012 will be held in **Brussels**, **August 23-27**, at the
Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB, Solbosch Campus).
The EuroSciPy
Hi all,
Travis, Mark, and I talked on Skype this week about how to
productively move forward with the NA debate, and I got picked to
summarize for the list :-).
There are three main things we discussed:
1) About process: We seem to agree that this discussion has been
ineffective for a variety
We need to decide what to do with the NA masking code currently in
master, vis-a-vis the 1.7 release. While this code is great at what it
is, we don't actually have consensus yet that it's the best way to
give our users what they want/need -- or even an appropriate way. So
we need to figure out
If you hang around big FOSS projects, you'll see the word consensus
come up a lot. For example, the glibc steering committee recently
dissolved itself in favor of governance directly by the consensus of
the people active in glibc development[1]. It's the governing rule of
the IETF, which defines
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
If you hang around big FOSS projects, you'll see the word consensus
come up a lot. For example, the glibc steering committee recently
dissolved itself in favor of governance directly by the consensus of
the people active
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
We need to decide what to do with the NA masking code currently in
master, vis-a-vis the 1.7 release. While this code is great at what it
is, we don't actually have consensus yet that it's the best way to
give our users
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
We need to decide what to do with the NA masking code currently in
master, vis-a-vis the 1.7 release. While this code is great at what
Hi Nathaniel,
thanks for a solid writeup of this topic. I just want to add a note
from personal experience, regarding this specific point:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
Usually disagreements are an indication that a
better solution is possible, even
13 matches
Mail list logo
