Re: [Numpy-discussion] StackOverflow documentation

2016-07-21 Thread josef . pktd
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > Thu, 21 Jul 2016 16:24:15 +0200, mail kirjoitti: > [clip] >> Since it is run by the community, perhaps it's not a bad idea to >> encourage people to share their examples. > > I would perhaps rather encourage people to improve

[Numpy-discussion] Adding covariance matrix of fitted parameters to fit methods of numpy.polynomial

2016-07-21 Thread Tom Bird
See issue #7780: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/7780 Would be good if the numpy.polynomial fit methods (e.g. numpy.polynomial.legendre.Legendre.fit) could return the covariance matrix of the fitted parameters, in the same way as numpy.polyfit. Let me know if there are any

Re: [Numpy-discussion] StackOverflow documentation

2016-07-21 Thread Pauli Virtanen
Thu, 21 Jul 2016 16:24:15 +0200, mail kirjoitti: [clip] > Since it is run by the community, perhaps it's not a bad idea to > encourage people to share their examples. I would perhaps rather encourage people to improve the "Numpy User Guide" or the main documentation. Of course, working on that

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Python 3 dict support (issue #5718)

2016-07-21 Thread Joseph Fox-Rabinovitz
I will do my best. I am not that familiar with rst or numpy docs, but that's what PRs are for after all. -Joe On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Marten van Kerkwijk wrote: > Yes, indeed, where should this be!? > > The logical place would be in the developer

Re: [Numpy-discussion] StackOverflow documentation

2016-07-21 Thread mail
>> StackOverflow now also has documentation, and there already is a NumPy tag: >> >> http://stackoverflow.com/documentation/numpy >> >> Not sure what, if anything, do we want to do with this, nor how to handle >> not having to different sources with the same information. Any thoughts? >From what

Re: [Numpy-discussion] StackOverflow documentation

2016-07-21 Thread Charles R Harris
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 5:47 AM, Jaime Fernández del Río < jaime.f...@gmail.com> wrote: > StackOverflow now also has documentation, and there already is a NumPy tag: > > http://stackoverflow.com/documentation/numpy > > Not sure what, if anything, do we want to do with this, nor how to handle >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Python 3 dict support (issue #5718)

2016-07-21 Thread Marten van Kerkwijk
I know it is slightly obnoxious to hold the "making a suggestion is to volunteer for it" -- but usually a PR to the docs is best made by someone who is trying to understand it rather than someone who already knows everything -- Marten ___

[Numpy-discussion] StackOverflow documentation

2016-07-21 Thread Jaime Fernández del Río
StackOverflow now also has documentation, and there already is a NumPy tag: http://stackoverflow.com/documentation/numpy Not sure what, if anything, do we want to do with this, nor how to handle not having to different sources with the same information. Any thoughts? Jaime -- (\__/) ( O.o) (

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Python 3 dict support (issue #5718)

2016-07-21 Thread Jaime Fernández del Río
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 9:39 PM, Hannah wrote: > I second (and third & fourth &...) this > > Thanks so much for this, Jaime, it's exactly what I was looking for and > couldn't find. Maybe this can be linked to in the contribute docs as an > "orienting yourself in the