Re: [Numpy-discussion] PowerPC testing servers

> A recent post to the wheel-builders mailing list pointed out some > links to places providing free PowerPC hosting for open source > projects, if they agree to a submitted request: The debian project has some powerpc machines (and we still build numpy on those boxes when i upload a new revision

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal to support __format__

Hi Gustav, This is great! A few quick comments (mostly echo-ing Stephan's). 1. You basically have a NEP already! Making a PR from it allows to give line-by-line comments, so would help! 2. Don't worry about supporting python2 specifics; just try to ensure it doesn't break; I would not say more

[Numpy-discussion] ANN: scipy 0.19.0 release candidate 1

Hi, I'm pleased to announce the availability of the first release candidate for scipy 0.19.0. It contains contributions from 120 people over the course of seven months. Please try this release and report any issues on Github tracker, https://github.com/scipy/scipy, or scipy-dev mailing list.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] PowerPC testing servers

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 7:37 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Matthew Brett > wrote: >> >> Hey, >> >> A recent post to the wheel-builders mailing list pointed out some >> links to places providing free PowerPC hosting

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal to support __format__

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Ilhan Polat wrote: > On the last item, do we really have to follow that strange, `d`,`g` and so > on conventions on formatting? With all respect to the humongous historical > baggage, I think that notation is pretty archaic and terminal

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ImportError: Importing the multiarray numpy extension module failed

Hi Nathan, Thanks for the quick response. Yeah - looks like the Google app engine supports only 1.6.1.. Reverting to that version has fixed this issue. Thanks AB On Feb 14, 2017 21:01, "Nathaniel Smith" wrote: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 8:24 PM, Amit Bhosle

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal to support __format__

> > This is great! Thanks! Glad to be met by enthusiasm about this. 1. You basically have a NEP already! Making a PR from it allows to > give line-by-line comments, so would help! I will do this soon. 2. Don't worry about supporting python2 specifics; just try to ensure > it doesn't break; I

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal to support __format__

On the last item, do we really have to follow that strange, `d`,`g` and so on conventions on formatting? With all respect to the humongous historical baggage, I think that notation is pretty archaic and terminal like. If being pythonic is of a concern here, maybe it is better to use a more verbose

Re: [Numpy-discussion] PowerPC testing servers

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 7:55 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Matthew Brett > wrote: >> >> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 7:37 PM, Ralf Gommers >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 8:02

Re: [Numpy-discussion] PowerPC testing servers

On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 7:37 PM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Matthew Brett > > wrote: > >> > >> Hey, > >> > >> A recent post

[Numpy-discussion] PowerPC testing servers

Hey, A recent post to the wheel-builders mailing list pointed out some links to places providing free PowerPC hosting for open source projects, if they agree to a submitted request: https://mail.python.org/pipermail/wheel-builders/2017-February/000257.html It would be good to get some testing

Re: [Numpy-discussion] PowerPC testing servers

On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hey, > > A recent post to the wheel-builders mailing list pointed out some > links to places providing free PowerPC hosting for open source > projects, if they agree to a submitted request: > >