Hi All,
I'm thinking of adding the template system I pulled out of Django to Numpy
to use in place of the current code generator. Its advantages are
documentation, flexibility, and maintainance. The code totals about 470 KB,
comes with a BSD license, and is compatible with Python = 2.3. I want to
Charles R Harris wrote:
Hi All,
I'm thinking of adding the template system I pulled out of Django to
Numpy to use in place of the current code generator. Its advantages are
documentation, flexibility, and maintainance. The code totals about 470
KB, comes with a BSD license, and is
Neal Becker wrote:
Where can I find a (hopefully simple) example of c-code for a ufunc?
Wow, that was easy. Maybe you can use this as an example:
#include boost/python/module.hpp
#include boost/python/class.hpp
#include boost/python/init.hpp
#include boost/python/def.hpp
#include
On Jan 11, 2008 2:58 PM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Charles R Harris wrote:
Hi All,
I'm thinking of adding the template system I pulled out of Django to
Numpy to use in place of the current code generator. Its advantages are
documentation, flexibility, and maintainance. The
Hi
Sorry for irrelevant subject.
I found elmer when I was googling for something to wrap my python/numpy code
to C/C++ automatically because I want a dll for some application and I know
nothing about python Api (shame on me). Does anybody successfully compiled
elmer on windows with mingw? Or is
Charles R Harris wrote:
On Jan 11, 2008 2:58 PM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Charles R Harris wrote:
Hi All,
I'm thinking of adding the template system I pulled out of Django to
Numpy to use in place of the current code
Hey Mani,
I've included Rick Ratzel on this since he is the author of elmer and
may have more guidance.
eric
mani sabri wrote:
Hi
Sorry for irrelevant subject.
I found elmer when I was googling for something to wrap my python/numpy code
to C/C++ automatically because I want a dll for
On Jan 11, 2008, Colin J. Williams wrote:
You make a good case that it's good not
to need to ponder what sort of
vector you are dealing with.
My guess is that the answer to your
question is no but I would need to
play with your code to see that. My
feeling is that, at the bottom of
the
OK, so far I've knocked it down to 35KB by removing stuff I'm not interested
in. It is now smaller than Cog, and 7x larger than the file we now use to do
the same job. I'm pretty sure I can make it leaner than that. It remains
extensible.
On Jan 11, 2008 7:02 PM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jan 11, 2008 9:59 PM, Basilisk96 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 11, 2008, Colin J. Williams wrote:
You make a good case that it's good not
to need to ponder what sort of
vector you are dealing with.
My guess is that the answer to your
question is no but I would need to
play
Charles R Harris wrote:
OK, so far I've knocked it down to 35KB by removing stuff I'm not
interested in. It is now smaller than Cog, and 7x larger than the file
we now use to do the same job. I'm pretty sure I can make it leaner
than that. It remains extensible.
One good way to see whereas
11 matches
Mail list logo
