2008/6/23 Alan McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Some docstrings have examples of how to use the function that aren't
executable code (see numpy.core.defmatrix.bmat for an example) in
their current form. Should these examples have the removed from
them to avoid them being picked up as doctests?
[ I'm new here and this has the feel of an FAQ but I couldn't find
anything at http://www.scipy.org/FAQ . If I should have looked
somewhere else a URL would be gratefully received. ]
What's the reasoning behind functions like sum() and cumsum() being
provided both as module functions
On Mon, June 23, 2008 10:38 am, Fabrice Silva wrote:
Dear all
I've tried to run f2py on a fortran file which used to be usable from
python some months ago.
Following command lines are applied with success (no errors raised) :
f2py -m modulename -h tmpo.pyf --overwrite-signature
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 02:03:06AM -0400, Anne Archibald wrote:
One way to track down this kind of problem is to look at the C code
that's generated. Easier, I admit, with a little familiarity with C,
but in any case code working with python variables will be obtrusively
strewn with functions
Leaks of Py_NotImplementedType to the user are regarded as errors by the
Python developers and google turns up several patches fixing such issues. In
numpy we have this problem because we issue the same call for, say,
right_shift as we do for . This leads to things like:
In [1]: int64(1)
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 1:03 AM, Stéfan van der Walt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/6/23 Alan McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Some docstrings have examples of how to use the function that aren't
executable code (see numpy.core.defmatrix.bmat for an example) in
their current form. Should these
Hi,
I need to display some numpy arrays in mantissa+exponent format (e.g.
'%.2e' using C syntax). In numpy.set_printoptions(), there is currently
only 'precision' option, which does not allow this.
What about having an option related to 'precision', named possibly
'float_format', with the
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Fernando Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's also the option of marking them so doctest skips them via
#doctest: +SKIP
http://docs.python.org/lib/doctest-options.html
For short examples, that seems like a good option, but it seems like
you have to have
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Pauli Virtanen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you make the convention chosen for the examples (currently only in
the doc wiki, not yet in SVN) to work: assuming import numpy as np in
examples?
This would remove the need for those from numpy import * lines in the
2008/6/23 Fernando Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Alan McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Fernando Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's also the option of marking them so doctest skips them via
#doctest: +SKIP
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Charles R Harris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leaks of Py_NotImplementedType to the user are regarded as errors by the
Python developers and google turns up several patches fixing such issues. In
numpy we have this problem because we issue the same call for, say,
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Stéfan van der Walt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another alternative is to replace +SKIP with something like +IGNORE.
That way, the statement is still executed, we just don't care about
its outcome. If we skip the line entirely, it often affects the rest
of the
2008/6/23 Alan McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Stéfan van der Walt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Another alternative is to replace +SKIP with something like +IGNORE.
That way, the statement is still executed, we just don't care about
its outcome. If we skip the line
Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:03:28 +0200, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
2008/6/23 Alan McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Some docstrings have examples of how to use the function that aren't
executable code (see numpy.core.defmatrix.bmat for an example) in their
current form. Should these examples have the
On 23 Jun 2008, at 12:37 PM, Alan McIntyre wrote:
Ugh. That just seems like a lot of unreadable ugliness to me. If
this comment magic is the only way to make that stuff execute
properly
under doctest, I think I'd rather just skip it in favor of clean,
uncluttered, non-doctestable code
Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:53:55 -0400, Anne Archibald wrote:
2008/6/23 Alan McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Stéfan van der Walt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Another alternative is to replace +SKIP with something like +IGNORE.
That way, the statement is still executed, we
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Pauli Virtanen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Schematic code (such as that currently in numpy.bmat) that doesn't run
probably shouldn't be written with , and for it the ReST block quote
syntax is also looks OK.
But I'm personally not in favor of a distinction
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Pauli Virtanen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another idea (in addition to whitelisting): how easy would it be to
subclass doctest.DocTestParser so that it would eg. automatically +IGNORE
any doctest lines containing plt.?
I'll play around with that and see how hard
2008/6/23 Michael McNeil Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 23 Jun 2008, at 12:37 PM, Alan McIntyre wrote:
Ugh. That just seems like a lot of unreadable ugliness to me. If
this comment magic is the only way to make that stuff execute
properly
under doctest, I think I'd rather just skip it in
I'm wondering if there is a currently-available Sparse-Matrix package for
numpy? If so, how do I get it?And, if there is a good sparse-matrix
package, does it include an eigenvalue-computation algorithm? How would a
sparse-matrix package interact with something like numpy.linalg.eig, or for
On 23 Jun 2008, at 1:28 PM, Anne Archibald wrote:
2008/6/23 Michael McNeil Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thus, one can argue that all examples should also be doctests. This
generally makes things a little more ugly, but much less ambiguous.
This is a bit awkward. How do you give an example for
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 15:44, Michael McNeil Forbes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 23 Jun 2008, at 1:28 PM, Anne Archibald wrote:
2008/6/23 Michael McNeil Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thus, one can argue that all examples should also be doctests. This
generally makes things a little more ugly,
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 4:51 PM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree that this can be awkward sometimes, and should certainly not
be policy, but one can usually get around this. Instead of printing
the result, you can use it, or demonstrate porperties:
random_array =
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 16:51, Michael McNeil Forbes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 4:51 PM, Robert Kern
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
random_array = np.random.rand(3,4)
random_array.shape
(3,4)
random_array.max() 1
True
random_array.min() 0
True
Yes, this makes it
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Bob Dowling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ I'm new here and this has the feel of an FAQ but I couldn't find
anything at http://www.scipy.org/FAQ . If I should have looked
somewhere else a URL would be gratefully received. ]
What's the reasoning behind functions
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 18:10, Sebastian Haase [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Bob Dowling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ I'm new here and this has the feel of an FAQ but I couldn't find
anything at http://www.scipy.org/FAQ . If I should have looked
somewhere else a URL
2008/6/23 Michael McNeil Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
One can usually do #3 - #1 or #2 by just leave bare assignments
without printing a result (the user can always execute them and look
at the result if they want).
r = np.random.rand(3,2,4)
which is cleaner than adding any flags...
2008/6/24 Stéfan van der Walt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It should be fairly easy to execute the example code, just to make
sure it runs. We can always work out a scheme to test its validity
later.
Mike Hansen just explained to me that the Sage doctest system sets the
random seed before executing
Hi Dan
2008/6/23 Dan Yamins [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm wondering if there is a currently-available Sparse-Matrix package for
numpy? If so, how do I get it?And, if there is a good sparse-matrix
package, does it include an eigenvalue-computation algorithm? How would a
sparse-matrix package
Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
2008/6/24 Stéfan van der Walt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It should be fairly easy to execute the example code, just to make
sure it runs. We can always work out a scheme to test its validity
later.
Hi,
Mike Hansen just explained to me that the Sage doctest system sets
Fernando Perez wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Michael Abshoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Fernando,
a) Random variables
we have some small extensions to the doctesting framework that allow us
to mark doctests as #random so that the result it not checked. Carl
Witty wrote some code
Robert Kern wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 18:10, Sebastian Haase [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Bob Dowling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ I'm new here and this has the feel of an FAQ but I couldn't find
anything at http://www.scipy.org/FAQ . If I should have looked
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Michael Abshoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not the author, so I need to find out who wrote the code, but I am
sure it can be made BSD. We are also working on doctest+timeit to hunt
for performance regressions, but that one is not ready for prime time yet.
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 19:35, Ryan May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Kern wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 18:10, Sebastian Haase [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Bob Dowling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ I'm new here and this has the feel of an FAQ but I couldn't find
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 5:58 PM, Michael Abshoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
2008/6/24 Stéfan van der Walt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It should be fairly easy to execute the example code, just to make
sure it runs. We can always work out a scheme to test its validity
Charles R Harris wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 5:58 PM, Michael Abshoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
2008/6/24 Stéfan van der Walt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It should be fairly easy to execute the
2008/6/23 Stéfan van der Walt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/6/24 Stéfan van der Walt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It should be fairly easy to execute the example code, just to make
sure it runs. We can always work out a scheme to test its validity
later.
Mike Hansen just explained to me that the Sage
2008/6/23 Michael Abshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Charles R Harris wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 5:58 PM, Michael Abshoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
2008/6/24 Stéfan van der Walt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 22:53, Anne Archibald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/6/23 Michael Abshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Correct, but so far Carl has hooked into six out of the many random
number generators in the various components of Sage. This way we can set
a global seed and also more easily
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 4:23 AM, Dan Yamins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3) Finally: (and this is slightly off topic) -- I've just installed SciPy
for the first time. In the readme.txt for the download it mentioned
something about having LAPACK and ATLAS installed. However, on the scipy
install
40 matches
Mail list logo
