Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
Linda,
2008/10/13 Linda Seltzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Those statements are not demeaning; lighten up.
STOP IT. JUST STOP IT. STOP IT RIGHT NOW.
Is there a moderator on the list to put a stop to these kinds of statements?
I deserve to be treated with respect.
I
Bill Baxter wrote:
import numpy as npy
Bill,
for what it's worth, I *think* this group has reached a consensus to use:
import numpy as np
We all have different tastes for how they might want to spell it, but
the more consistent we are, the easier it will be for newbies.
-Chris
--
Linda Seltzer wrote:
I would appreciate it if someone could answer my question without
referring to subjects such as APIs and interfaces, since I am only
concerned with a mathematical application at this time.
caution: this is a bit rude -- that was an excellent and informative
answer to your
Linda,
2008/10/13 Linda Seltzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Those statements are not demeaning; lighten up.
STOP IT. JUST STOP IT. STOP IT RIGHT NOW.
Is there a moderator on the list to put a stop to these kinds of statements?
I deserve to be treated with respect.
I deserve to have my questions
All,
Sorry to bring back this subject, but I still haven't got any proper answers:
* What are the priority rules between numpy scalars and 0d arrays ?
When multiplying a numpy scalar by a 0d array, shouldn't the __mul__ or
__rmul__ methods of the array be called ?
Should the result be a numpy
Pierre GM wrote:
All,
Sorry to bring back this subject, but I still haven't got any proper answers:
* What are the priority rules between numpy scalars and 0d arrays ?
There aren't really any specified. However, there is behavior that
emerges from what is specified.
The problem is that
Where is the moderator? Please get these condescending, demeaning personal
comments off of this list. I asked technical question. Now please send
technical information only.
Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
I think you'll be hard pressed to find a more friendly, open and
relaxed mailing list than
Christopher Barker wrote:
No matter how you slice it, you're going to need to learn a bit about
computer programming in general, and python in particular, in order to
be productive with numpy.
WHERE IS THE MODERATOR?
I deserve not to be insulted in front of the professional community with
Travis,
The problem is that there has never been a formal resolution (that I
recall) of when should something be returned as a 0-d array and when it
should be returned as a scalar. There is rather an informal
implementation of what actually happens.
Ah. It might be worth putting the
On Oct 13, 2008, at 7:21 AM, Linda Seltzer wrote:
Is there a moderator on the list to put a stop to these kinds of
statements?
No.
Andrew
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Numpy-discussion
Linda Seltzer wrote:
Where is the moderator? Please get these condescending, demeaning personal
comments off of this list. I asked technical question. Now please send
technical information only.
The problem is, you did not just ask
for technical information. You also
accused people of being
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 13:36, Linda Seltzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christopher Barker wrote:
No matter how you slice it, you're going to need to learn a bit about
computer programming in general, and python in particular, in order to
be productive with numpy.
WHERE IS THE MODERATOR?
There
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Alan G Isaac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is, you did not just ask
for technical information. You also
accused people of being condescending
and demeaning. But nobody was
condescending or demeaning. As several
people **politely** explained to you,
Your reply is inappropriate. it is not a correction. A request was
made to stop posting mail that did not concern math and you have continued
with your put downs. Stop it. Just stop it. Stop it right now.
Linda Seltzer wrote:
Where is the moderator? Please get these condescending, demeaning
Alan, Stop tuyrning this around. Stop referring to my request as an
accusation and stop referring to your put-downs as a correction.
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Alan G Isaac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is, you did not just ask
for technical information. You also
accused people
Ordinarily I avoid becoming involved in such acrimony, but I take this
single
opportunity to state clearly that I find Linda Seltzer's behavior utterly
rude
and childish.
Having been a member of this mailing list for over 6 years, I take
exception
to the pointless ranting and vitriolic comments
This ia another example of non-scientific attacking that does not belong
on the list. As I mentioned earlier: Please keep all non-mathematical or
non-computer science remarks off the list.
Ordinarily I avoid becoming involved in such acrimony, but I take this
single
opportunity to state
On Oct 13, 2008, at 4:16 PM, Linda Seltzer wrote:
Alan, Stop tuyrning this around. Stop referring to my request as an
accusation and stop referring to your put-downs as a correction.
Linda, from what I can tell, the tone in this discussion thread
changed from the professional, technical
Linda has informed me that she has left the mailing list. Please
consider this and all related threads closed.
--
Robert Kern
I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless
enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as
though it had an underlying
I know, I know, last one...
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
I had forgotten this wise quote from the smart questions FAQ:
Be gentle. Problem-related stress can make people seem rude or stupid
even when they're not.
Best,
Matthew
Is there a routine in scipy for telling whether a point is inside a
convex 4 sided polygon?
Mathew
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
2008/10/13 Mathew Yeates [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there a routine in scipy for telling whether a point is inside a
convex 4 sided polygon?
Not specifically in scipy, as far as I know, but there are several
supplementary packages that provide this functionality, including
matplotlib:
2008/10/13 Mathew Yeates [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there a routine in scipy for telling whether a point is inside a
convex 4 sided polygon?
Mathew,
You could use OGR (www.gdal.org)
Example
-
import osgeo.ogr as ogr
vert = [(0,0),(0,1),(1,1),(1,0)]
listvert = [ %s %s % (x,y) for
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Pierre GM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/10/13 Mathew Yeates [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there a routine in scipy for telling whether a point is inside a
convex 4 sided polygon?
Mathew,
You could use OGR (www.gdal.org)
Example
-
import osgeo.ogr
Hi,
I'm new to using SWIG and my reading of numpy_swig.pdf tells me that
the following typemap does not exist:
(int* ARGOUT_ARRAY2, int DIM1, int DIM2)
What is the recommended way to output a 2D array? It seems like I should use:
(int* ARGOUT_ARRAY1, int DIM1)
and then provide a python
Hi Matthew
Here is an implementation in Python, ctypes and in weave:
http://mentat.za.net/source/pnpoly.tar.bz2
Regards
Stéfan
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
26 matches
Mail list logo
