We are glad to announce release 2.4 of the Modular toolkit for Data
Processing (MDP).
MDP is a Python library of widely used data processing algorithms that
can be combined according to a pipeline analogy to build more complex
data processing software. The base of available algorithms includes,
Hi,
A quick note to mention I have generated a superpack installer for
scipy, for testing purposes. This is similar to numpy superpack
installer: the installer detects your CPU at installation time and
install the right scipy:
Thanks for the pointers. I'll produce some code to show what I have in
mind, and then come back to the list.
Cheers,
Joris
Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
Hi,
this mailing list disappeared from google groups.
Is there a reason for this ? Did I miss something ?
Greetings, Uwe
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
I'm getting a 404 on that url.
--bb
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 7:36 PM, David Cournapeau
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
A quick note to mention I have generated a superpack installer for
scipy, for testing purposes. This is similar to numpy superpack
installer: the installer detects your CPU
Bill Baxter wrote:
I'm getting a 404 on that url.
It should work now.
David
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 07:20, Uwe Schmitt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
this mailing list disappeared from google groups.
Is there a reason for this ? Did I miss something ?
I don't know. That gateway was not managed by us. IIRC Mike McLay was
the one who started it.
--
Robert Kern
I have
Hi all,
This is my first mail to the mailing list, and I would like to know if anybody
has a great idea about the use or not of Numpy and loops in Python.
So here is my problem : I've a large list of tuple (id, time),
id being integer between [0, ..., N] and time float values.
I want to have
bevan,
Thanks for reporting. I'll try to find to correct that and will keep you
posted.
Cheers
P.
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Bevan,
After digging a bit, I don't think it's gonna be possible any time soon to
print a date w/ a year prior 1900. The reason is that we use the
datetime.strftime under the hood, and this method is intrinsicly limited to
years after 1900.
Note that this limitation affects only printing and
Hello everyone!
I wonder if support for generic N-dimensional arrays has been added to
NumPy since January 2003 (the last time this question was asked in
this newsgroup). If not, is there some interest in trying to add this
data structure to NumPy? It may not seem very useful for scientific
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 15:09, Yakov Keselman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone!
I wonder if support for generic N-dimensional arrays has been added to
NumPy since January 2003 (the last time this question was asked in
this newsgroup).
No.
If not, is there some interest in trying to
Charles R Harris wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Ryan May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I noticed numpy.loadtxt has support for gzipped text files, but not for
bz2'd files. Here's a 3 line patch to add bzip2 support to loadtxt.
Ryan
--
Ryan May
Graduate Research Assistant
Hi all,
much delayed, but here it is, finally. The doc regarding our
discussion about PEP 225 is attached, and I'm keeping a public copy
for viewing convenience (with html) here:
https://cirl.berkeley.edu/fperez/static/numpy-pep225/
Note that, as indicated in the link above, the real doc is in
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 16:00, Fernando Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
much delayed, but here it is, finally. The doc regarding our
discussion about PEP 225 is attached, and I'm keeping a public copy
for viewing convenience (with html) here:
On Oct 22, 2008, at 5:15 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
I would add another position (my own) to the Arguments neutral
towards or against the PEP:
* I really only care about having just *one* extra operator, one that
I can (ab)use for matrix multiplication. It's the only operation that
is common
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 02:00:20PM -0700, Fernando Perez wrote:
Hi all,
much delayed, but here it is, finally. The doc regarding our
discussion about PEP 225 is attached, and I'm keeping a public copy
for viewing convenience (with html) here:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 16:24, Perry Greenfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 22, 2008, at 5:15 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
I would add another position (my own) to the Arguments neutral
towards or against the PEP:
* I really only care about having just *one* extra operator, one that
I can
Fernando Perez wrote:
much delayed, but here it is, finally. The doc regarding our
discussion about PEP 225 is attached, and I'm keeping a public copy
for viewing convenience (with html) here:
https://cirl.berkeley.edu/fperez/static/numpy-pep225/
Is there a use for more operators outside
Hi
Please keep your replies on list. It's important that this thread in
particular is publicly archived, since it may serve as the reference
for further discussions.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Sebastien Binet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fernando,
much delayed, but here it is, finally.
Perry Greenfield wrote:
On Oct 22, 2008, at 5:15 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
I would add another position (my own) to the Arguments neutral
towards or against the PEP:
* I really only care about having just *one* extra operator, one that
I can (ab)use for matrix multiplication. It's the only
21 matches
Mail list logo
