On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 11:50 PM, David Cournapeau
da...@ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp wrote:
Charles R Harris wrote:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 11:08 PM, David Cournapeau
da...@ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp mailto:da...@ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp
wrote:
Hi,
I have a question related to
Charles R Harris wrote:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 11:08 PM, David Cournapeau
da...@ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp mailto:da...@ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp
wrote:
Hi,
I have a question related to #1121
(http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/1121). With python 2.6,
PyInt_Check(a) if a
Hello,
Multiplying a Python float to a numpy.array of objects works flawlessly
but not with a numpy.float64 .
I tried numpy version '1.0.4' on a 32 bit Linux and '1.2.1' on a 64
bit Linux: both raise the same exception.
Is this a (known) bug?
-- test.py
A Monday 01 June 2009 20:26:27 Charles R Harris escrigué:
I suppose that the NumPy crew already experimented this divergence and
finally
used the cast approach for computing the single precision functions.
It was inherited and was no doubt the simplest approach at the time. It has
always
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 12:37 PM, David Cournapeau
da...@ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp wrote:
Robert Kern wrote:
This does not solve the C function problem (PyArray_Correlate). The easy
solution would be to keep the current C version, deal with the problem
in python for acorrelate for the time being,
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:36 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
Done in r7031 - correlate/PyArray_Correlate should be unchanged, and
acorrelate/PyArray_Acorrelate implement the conventional definitions,
I don't know if it's been discussed before but while people are
thinking
Robin wrote:
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:36 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
Done in r7031 - correlate/PyArray_Correlate should be unchanged, and
acorrelate/PyArray_Acorrelate implement the conventional definitions,
I don't know if it's been discussed before but while
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 5:59 AM, David Cournapeau
da...@ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp wrote:
Robin wrote:
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:36 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com
wrote:
Done in r7031 - correlate/PyArray_Correlate should be unchanged, and
acorrelate/PyArray_Acorrelate implement the
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 1:42 AM, Sebastian Walter
sebastian.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Multiplying a Python float to a numpy.array of objects works flawlessly
but not with a numpy.float64 .
I tried numpy version '1.0.4' on a 32 bit Linux and '1.2.1' on a 64
bit Linux: both raise the same
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Keith Goodman kwgood...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 1:42 AM, Sebastian Walter
sebastian.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Multiplying a Python float to a numpy.array of objects works flawlessly
but not with a numpy.float64 .
I tried numpy
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Darren Dale dsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Keith Goodman kwgood...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 1:42 AM, Sebastian Walter
sebastian.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Multiplying a Python float to a numpy.array of objects
Announcing Numexpr 1.3
Numexpr is a fast numerical expression evaluator for NumPy. With it,
expressions that operate on arrays (like 3*a+4*b) are accelerated
and use less memory than doing the same calculation in Python.
On this release, and
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 13:19, Turner, Todd J Civ USAF AFMC AFRL/RXLMP
todd.tur...@wpafb.af.mil wrote:
I’m having some numpy problems when using the package with Python. My admin
installed numpy for me and we think it’s installed right. When I’m in
python and type ‘import numpy’ I get the
All right, here goes...
print numpy.__file__
/home/d1/turnertj/Python-2.5.4/lib/python2.5/site-packages/numpy/numpy/__init__.pyc
[turne...@daneel numpy]$ ls
add_newdocs.py ctypeslib.pyc dual.py _import_tools.py libnumarray
setup.py tests
coredistutils f2py
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 13:35, Turner, Todd J Civ USAF AFMC AFRL/RXLMP
todd.tur...@wpafb.af.mil wrote:
All right, here goes...
print numpy.__file__
/home/d1/turnertj/Python-2.5.4/lib/python2.5/site-packages/numpy/numpy/__init__.pyc
That looks like it was definitely installed incorrectly, then.
Hi,
It's occasionally annoyed me that NpzFiles can't be swapped in
transparently for an in-memory dictionary since getting at the keys
requires an attribute access. Below is a patch that implements some
more of the dictionary interface for the NpzFile class. Any comments
as to whether
I also think that the conjugate should be taken. I spent the last few weeks
using correlate to experiment with
signal processing and I got strange results until I realised that I had to
manually take the conjugate. It
would also be good if the function did it since applying the conjugate to
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 21:37, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
how do we catch a multiarray.error in a try except clause?
e.g.
np.argmin([])
Traceback (most recent call last):
File pyshell#147, line 1, in module
Charles R Harris wrote:
I also think that having weighting options would be good. I now
understand the complexities of the various
weightings that can be applied to the correlation i.e. biased vs
unbiased but I think that having correlate
include these options might
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 21:20, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 21:37, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
how do we catch a multiarray.error in a try except clause?
e.g.
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 21:20, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 21:37, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
how
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 21:20, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 21:37, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 21:41, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 21:20, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Robert Kern
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 21:41, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 21:20, Charles R Harris
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 22:21, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
OK. I left the strings exposed in the modules with a fixme notes. Do you
think they should be removed while we are at it?
I think they should be replaced with the Exception classes that are
being raised in their
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 22:21, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
OK. I left the strings exposed in the modules with a fixme notes. Do you
think they should be removed while we are at it?
I think they
26 matches
Mail list logo
