Francesc Alted wrote:
A Thursday 03 December 2009 14:56:16 Dag Sverre Seljebotn escrigué:
Pauli Virtanen wrote:
Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:03:13 +0100, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
[clip]
Great! Are you storing the format string in the dtype types as well? (So
that no release is needed and
(also posted on scipy-user)
ANNOUNCEMENT
I am pleased to announce the initial release of upfirdn. This package
provides an efficient polyphase FIR resampler object (SWIG-ed C++) and some
python wrappers.
https://opensource.motorola.com/sf/projects/upfirdn
MOTIVATION
As a long time
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
da...@student.matnat.uio.no wrote:
Perhaps this should be marked as a bug? I'm not sure about that, because the
above seems quite useful.
Well, I for one don't like this, but that's just an opinion. I think it
is unwise to leave object
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Travis Oliphant oliph...@enthought.comwrote:
On Dec 4, 2009, at 10:09 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 6:29 AM, Travis Oliphant oliph...@enthought.comwrote:
What do people think of applying patch #1085. This patch makes a copy of
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 1:32 AM, David Goldsmith d.l.goldsm...@gmail.comwrote:
Dan-
I almost hate to ask - after what you've already provided, which is
substantial: did you ever try out what alestic had to offer? If not, I may
be that guinea pig. ;-)
David -- I'm posting my response to
On 04-Dec-09 05:21 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
pe, 2009-12-04 kello 11:19 +0100, Chris Colbert kirjoitti:
Why cant the divisor constant just be made an optional kwarg that
defaults to zero?
It already is an optional kwarg that defaults to zero.
Cheers,
I suggested that 1
On 04-Dec-09 07:18 AM, yogesh karpate wrote:
@ Pauli and @ Colin:
Sorry for the late reply. I was busy
in some other assignments.
# As far as normalization by(n) is concerned then its common
assumption that the population is normally distributed and
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Dan Yamins dyam...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 1:32 AM, David Goldsmith
d.l.goldsm...@gmail.comwrote:
Dan-
I almost hate to ask - after what you've already provided, which is
substantial: did you ever try out what alestic had to offer? If
Colin J. Williams skrev:
suggested that 1 (one) would be a better default but Robert Kern told
us that it won't happen.
I don't even see the need for this keyword argument, as you can always
multiply the variance by n/(n-1) to get what you want.
Also, normalization by n gives the ML
Hi,
I'd like to commit my Py3 Numpy branch to SVN trunk soon:
http://github.com/pv/numpy-work/commits/py3k
For an overview, check the notes:
http://github.com/pv/numpy-work/blob/py3k/doc/Py3K.txt
None of the changes should affect behavior on Py2. The test status
currently is:
On 29-Nov-09, at 4:46 PM, David Warde-Farley wrote:
On 27-Nov-09, at 6:29 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
3.9.12 segfaulted on me while running, so I haven't bothered with
versions after that. Why not try the stable version 3.8.3?
Just to follow up, I went back to 3.9.11 and numpy works
la, 2009-12-05 kello 20:27 -0500, David Warde-Farley kirjoitti:
[clip]
I've briefly been trying to figure out how to work around this, but
I'm a bit confused. I was under the (mistaken?) impression that the
f2c'd code in dlapack_lite.c, zlapack_lite.c and dlamch.c was only
used in the
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to commit my Py3 Numpy branch to SVN trunk soon:
http://github.com/pv/numpy-work/commits/py3k
For an overview, check the notes:
http://github.com/pv/numpy-work/blob/py3k/doc/Py3K.txt
That's a
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to commit my Py3 Numpy branch to SVN trunk soon:
http://github.com/pv/numpy-work/commits/py3k
For an overview, check
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to commit my Py3 Numpy branch to SVN trunk soon:
http://github.com/pv/numpy-work/commits/py3k
Awesome - I think we should merge this ASAP. In particular, I would
like to start fixing platforms-specific
On 12/3/2009 12:40 AM, Peter Cai wrote:
If I have homogeneous linear equations like this
array([[-0.75, 0.25, 0.25, 0.25],
[ 1. , -1. , 0. , 0. ],
[ 1. , 0. , -1. , 0. ],
[ 1. , 0. , 0. , -1. ]])
And I want to get a non-zero solution for it. How
16 matches
Mail list logo
