Re: [Numpy-discussion] linalg.det throws IndexError on 2.6.5

Yeah, there were no previous installs. Well, I removed the pip installed numpy and did a python setup.py install and all works now. Really bizarre, I didn't think pip did much outside of the standard python setup.py install, other that some more automation. Thanks for the help. Ilya On Sun, Ma

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Introduction to Scott, Jason, and (possibly) others from Enthought

On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 2:06 AM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Ralf Gommers < >> ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Pauli

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Introduction to Scott, Jason, and (possibly) others from Enthought

On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 2:06 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: >> >>> Fri, 28 May 2010 12:13:57 -0500, Travis Oliphant wrote: >>> [clip] >>> > I think this makes sense so tha

Re: [Numpy-discussion] linalg.det throws IndexError on 2.6.5

On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Ilya Sterin wrote: > Numpy 1.4.1. I built it myself. > > The version of numpy in question on CentOS was built against a 2.6.5 > version of python 64 bit binary and built/installed with pip. > > The version which is working on my OS X is a universal binary and bot

Re: [Numpy-discussion] linalg.det throws IndexError on 2.6.5

Numpy 1.4.1. I built it myself. The version of numpy in question on CentOS was built against a 2.6.5 version of python 64 bit binary and built/installed with pip. The version which is working on my OS X is a universal binary and both python and numpy are built as such. I'm running python in 64b

Re: [Numpy-discussion] linalg.det throws IndexError on 2.6.5

On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Ilya Sterin wrote: > I'm not sure what's causing this at this point and before I dig deeper > thought someone can shed some light... > > On my Mac OS X python 2.6.1, numpy.linalg.det functions properly... > > >>> numpy.linalg.det(numpy.array([[1, 2], [3, 4]])) > -

[Numpy-discussion] linalg.det throws IndexError on 2.6.5

I'm not sure what's causing this at this point and before I dig deeper thought someone can shed some light... On my Mac OS X python 2.6.1, numpy.linalg.det functions properly... >>> numpy.linalg.det(numpy.array([[1, 2], [3, 4]])) -2.0 On Centos 5 python 2.6.5, I get and IndexError (out of bounds

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Introduction to Scott, Jason, and (possibly) others from Enthought

On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > >> Fri, 28 May 2010 12:13:57 -0500, Travis Oliphant wrote: >> [clip] >> > I think this makes sense so that we can reschedule NumPy 2.0 for >> > September and still provide a release

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Finding Star Images on a Photo (Video chip) Plate?

Good. I'll latch onto them (bookmark) them soon. I like the organic description. On 5/29/2010 12:09 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > Sat, 29 May 2010 11:29:56 -0700, Wayne Watson wrote: > [clip] > >> SciPy. Hmm, this looks reasonable.. >> Somehow I missed it and i

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Introduction to Scott, Jason, and (possibly) others from Enthought

On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > Fri, 28 May 2010 12:13:57 -0500, Travis Oliphant wrote: > [clip] > > I think this makes sense so that we can reschedule NumPy 2.0 for > > September and still provide a release with the Python 3k changes (I am > > assuming these can be done

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ix_ and copies

On 30 May 2010 11:25, Keith Goodman wrote: > On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Anne Archibald > wrote: >> On 29 May 2010 15:09, Robert Kern wrote: >>> On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 12:27, Keith Goodman wrote: Will making changes to arr2 never change arr1 if arr2 = arr1[np.ix_(*lists)] >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ix_ and copies

On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Anne Archibald wrote: > On 29 May 2010 15:09, Robert Kern wrote: >> On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 12:27, Keith Goodman wrote: >>> Will making changes to arr2 never change arr1 if >>> >>> arr2 = arr1[np.ix_(*lists)] >>> >>> where lists is a list of (index) lists? np.ix_