On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:50 PM, Nicolai Heitz nicolaihe...@gmx.de wrote:
m 27.10.2010 02:02, schrieb Sebastian Walter:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 12:59 AM, Pauli Virtanenp...@iki.fi wrote:
Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:24:39 -0700, Nicolai Heitz wrote:
I have used both linear least squares and radial basis functions as a
proxy equation, calculated from the results of computer simulations
which are calculating some objective function value based on a number of
varied input parameters.
As an alternative option I want to add a quadratic
On 26 October 2010 21:02, Dewald Pieterse dewald.piete...@gmail.com wrote:
I see my slicing was the problem, np.vstack((test[:1], test)) works
perfectly.
Yes and no. np.newaxis (or None for short) is a very useful tool;
you just stick it in an index expression and it adds an axis of length
one
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 06:38, Brennan Williams
brennan.willi...@visualreservoir.com wrote:
I have used both linear least squares and radial basis functions as a
proxy equation, calculated from the results of computer simulations
which are calculating some objective function value based on a
Hi Chuck,
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to do something here, but I'm waiting for a consensus and for
someone to test things out, maybe with a test repo, to make sure things
operate correctly. The documentation isn't that clear...
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Darren Dale dsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Chuck,
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to do something here, but I'm waiting for a consensus and for
someone to test things out, maybe with a test repo,
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Darren Dale dsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Chuck,
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to do something here, but I'm
On 29/10/2010 2:34 a.m., Robert Kern wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 06:38, Brennan Williams
brennan.willi...@visualreservoir.com wrote:
I have used both linear least squares and radial basis functions as a
proxy equation, calculated from the results of computer simulations
which are
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:33, Brennan Williams
brennan.willi...@visualreservoir.com wrote:
On 29/10/2010 2:34 a.m., Robert Kern wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 06:38, Brennan Williams
brennan.willi...@visualreservoir.com wrote:
I have used both linear least squares and radial basis
On 29/10/2010 6:35 a.m., Robert Kern wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:33, Brennan Williams
brennan.willi...@visualreservoir.com wrote:
On 29/10/2010 2:34 a.m., Robert Kern wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 06:38, Brennan Williams
brennan.willi...@visualreservoir.comwrote:
I have
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:47, Brennan Williams
brennan.willi...@visualreservoir.com wrote:
On 29/10/2010 6:35 a.m., Robert Kern wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:33, Brennan Williams
brennan.willi...@visualreservoir.com wrote:
On 29/10/2010 2:34 a.m., Robert Kern wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28,
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:23 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Charles R Harris
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Darren Dale dsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
And now the bad news: I have not been able to verify that Git respects
the autocrlf setting or the eol
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Darren Dale dsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:23 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Charles R Harris
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Darren Dale dsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
And now the bad news: I have not been
hmm, I have just realized that I forgot to upload the new version to pypi:
it is now available on
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/algopy
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Sebastian Walter
sebastian.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:50 PM, Nicolai Heitz nicolaihe...@gmx.de wrote:
m
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:23 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Darren Dale dsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:23 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Charles R Harris
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Darren Dale
I have an ndarray with named dimensions. I find myself writing some
fairly laborious code with lots of square brackets and quotes. It seems
like it wouldn't be such a big deal to overload __getattribute__ so
instead of doing:
r = genfromtxt('results.dat',dtype=[('a','int'), ('b', 'f8'),
On 10/28/10 1:25 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
No, I did not. You are right, this shows \r\n. Why is it necessary to
open them as binary? IIUC (OIDUC), one should use 'rU' to unify line
endings.
Although, on a mac:
In [1]:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 15:17, Ian Stokes-Rees
ijsto...@hkl.hms.harvard.edu wrote:
I have an ndarray with named dimensions. I find myself writing some
fairly laborious code with lots of square brackets and quotes. It seems
like it wouldn't be such a big deal to overload __getattribute__ so
On 10/28/10 5:29 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 15:17, Ian Stokes-Rees
ijsto...@hkl.hms.harvard.edu wrote:
I have an ndarray with named dimensions. I find myself writing some
fairly laborious code with lots of square brackets and quotes. It seems
like it wouldn't be such a
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 16:37, Ian Stokes-Rees
ijsto...@hkl.hms.harvard.edu wrote:
On 10/28/10 5:29 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 15:17, Ian Stokes-Rees
ijsto...@hkl.hms.harvard.edu wrote:
I have an ndarray with named dimensions. I find myself writing some
fairly laborious
The __index__ method returns an integer from an array.
The current behavior follows the idea of return an integer if there is
1-element in the array
Your suggestion is to only return an integer if it is a rank-0 array, otherwise
raise an error.
This could potentially be changed in
21 matches
Mail list logo
