Re: [Numpy-discussion] Testsuite fails with Python 2.7.3rc1 and 3.2.3rc1 (Debian)

2012-04-07 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 12:25, Ralf Gommers >>> wrote: >>> > OK, that makes sen

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Testsuite fails with Python 2.7.3rc1 and 3.2.3rc1 (Debian)

2012-04-07 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > >> On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 12:25, Ralf Gommers >> wrote: >> > OK, that makes sense. So there are six test runs; for normal and debug >> > builds of 2.6.7, 2.7.3rc1 and 3.2.3rc2. Only

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Testsuite fails with Python 2.7.3rc1 and 3.2.3rc1 (Debian)

2012-04-07 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 12:25, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > > OK, that makes sense. So there are six test runs; for normal and debug > > builds of 2.6.7, 2.7.3rc1 and 3.2.3rc2. Only the debug builds of the RCs > > have a problem, debug build of 2.6.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Testsuite fails with Python 2.7.3rc1 and 3.2.3rc1 (Debian)

2012-04-07 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 12:25, Ralf Gommers wrote: > OK, that makes sense. So there are six test runs; for normal and debug > builds of 2.6.7, 2.7.3rc1 and 3.2.3rc2. Only the debug builds of the RCs > have a problem, debug build of 2.6.7 is fine. exactly. > So I'd think that most likely there is

Re: [Numpy-discussion] problem with vectorized difference equation

2012-04-07 Thread eat
Hi, On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 1:27 AM, Sameer Grover wrote: > On Saturday 07 April 2012 02:51 AM, Francesco Barale wrote: > > Hello Sameer, > > > > Thank you very much for your reply. My goal was to try to speed up the > loop > > describing the accumulator. In the (excellent) book I was mentioning i

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Improving NumPy's indexing / subsetting / fancy indexing implementation

2012-04-07 Thread Wes McKinney
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 4:00 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> >> Hi Wes, >> >> I believe that Mark rewrote a bunch of the fancy-indexing-related code >> from scratch in the masked-NA branch. I don't know if it affects >> anything you're ta

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Bitwise operations and unsigned types

2012-04-07 Thread Travis Oliphant
If we just announce that there has been some code changes that alter corner-case casting rules, I think we can move forward. We could use a script to document the changes and create a test case which would help people figure out their code. Please speak up if you have another point of view?

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Improving NumPy's indexing / subsetting / fancy indexing implementation

2012-04-07 Thread Charles R Harris
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 4:00 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > Hi Wes, > > I believe that Mark rewrote a bunch of the fancy-indexing-related code > from scratch in the masked-NA branch. I don't know if it affects > anything you're talking about here, but just as a heads up, you might > want to benchmar

Re: [Numpy-discussion] empty chararrays (ticket 1948)

2012-04-07 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Ralf Gommers < >> ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> In ticket 1948 a backwards compat

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Bitwise operations and unsigned types

2012-04-07 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:57 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Travis Oliphant >> wrote: >> > That is an interesting point of view. I could see that point of >> view. >> > But, was this discussed as a