I know used a somewhat jokey tone in my original posting, but fundamentally
it was a serious question concerning a live topic. So I'm curious about the
lack of response. Has this all been covered before?
Sorry if I'm being too impatient!
On 25 April 2012 16:58, Richard Hattersley
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Richard Hattersley
rhatters...@gmail.comwrote:
I know used a somewhat jokey tone in my original posting, but
fundamentally it was a serious question concerning a live topic. So I'm
curious about the lack of response. Has this all been covered before?
Sorry if
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Richard Hattersley
rhatters...@gmail.com wrote:
I know used a somewhat jokey tone in my original posting, but fundamentally
it was a serious question concerning a live topic. So I'm curious about the
lack of response. Has this all been covered before?
Sorry
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Richard Hattersley
rhatters...@gmail.comwrote:
The masked array discussions have brought up all sorts of interesting
topics - too many to usefully list here - but there's one aspect I haven't
spotted yet. Perhaps that's because it's flat out wrong, or crazy, or
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Richard Hattersley rhatters...@gmail.com
wrote:
The masked array discussions have brought up all sorts of interesting
topics - too many to usefully list here - but there's
Dear all,
(Sorry if you receive this announcement multiple times.)
Registration for SciPy 2012, the eleventh annual Conference on Scientific
Computing with Python, is open! Go to
https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2012/register/index.php
We would like to remind you that the submissions for
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Richard Hattersley
rhatters...@gmail.com wrote:
The masked array discussions have
Hi all,
Thanks for all your responses and for your patience with a newcomer. Don't
worry - I'm not going to give up yet. It's all just part of my learning the
ropes.
On 27 April 2012 14:05, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
snipYour idea is interesting, but doesn't it require C++? Or maybe
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 9:16 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Richard Hattersley
On Apr 25, 2012, at 10:58 AM, Richard Hattersley wrote:
The masked array discussions have brought up all sorts of interesting topics
- too many to usefully list here - but there's one aspect I haven't spotted
yet. Perhaps that's because it's flat out wrong, or crazy, or just too
awkward
We are pleased to announce the release of statsmodels 0.4.0.
The big changes in this release are that most models can now be used
with Pandas dataframes, and that we dropped the scikits namespace.
Importing scikits.statsmodels is still possible but will be removed in
the future.
Pandas is now a
With NumPy 1.6.1 (from EPD 7.2-2) I get this behavior:
~
In [1]: import numpy as np
In [2]: schema = np.dtype({'names':['symbol', 'date', 'open', 'high', 'low',
...:'close', 'volume', 'adjclose'],
...:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 21:52, Travis Vaught tra...@vaught.net wrote:
With NumPy 1.6.1 (from EPD 7.2-2) I get this behavior:
~
In [1]: import numpy as np
In [2]: schema = np.dtype({'names':['symbol', 'date', 'open', 'high', 'low',
...:
With bytes fields, genfromtxt(dtype=None) sets the sizes of the fields to
the largest number of chars (npyio.py line 1596), but it doesn't do the
same for unicode fields, which is a pity. See example below.
I tried to change npyio.py around line 1600 to add that but it didn't work;
from my
14 matches
Mail list logo
