is this intended?
np.histogramdd([[1,2],[3,4]],bins=2)
(array([[ 1., 0.],
[ 0., 1.]]),
[array([ 1. , 1.5, 2. ]), array([ 3. , 3.5, 4. ])])
np.histogram2d([1,2],[3,4],bins=2)
(array([[ 1., 0.],
[ 0., 1.]]),
array([ 1. , 1.5, 2. ]),
array([ 3. , 3.5, 4.
On 12 May 2012 22:55, Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 05/11/2012 03:37 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 11 May 2012 12:13, Dag Sverre Seljebotnd.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no
wrote:
(NumPy devs: I know, I get too many ideas. But this time I *really*
believe
in it, I think
For what it's worth, I'd prefer ndmasked.
As has been mentioned elsewhere, some algorithms can't really cope with
missing data. I'd very much rather they fail than silently give incorrect
results. Working in the climate prediction business (as with many other
domains I'm sure), even the
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Paul Anton Letnes
paul.anton.let...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 2:56
On 05/14/2012 06:31 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 12 May 2012 22:55, Dag Sverre Seljebotnd.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 05/11/2012 03:37 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 11 May 2012 12:13, Dag Sverre Seljebotnd.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no
wrote:
(NumPy devs: I know, I get too many ideas.
On 05/14/2012 10:36 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 05/14/2012 06:31 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 12 May 2012 22:55, Dag Sverre Seljebotnd.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no
wrote:
On 05/11/2012 03:37 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 11 May 2012 12:13, Dag Sverre Seljebotnd.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Dinesh Prasad dprasad...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hello. I am new to the list thanks for accepting my question.
I am trying to run the attached code, directly from the book in the title.
It simply calculates correlation of returns of the stock listed in the
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 5:31 PM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.comwrote:
On 12 May 2012 22:55, Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no
wrote:
On 05/11/2012 03:37 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 11 May 2012 12:13, Dag Sverre Seljebotnd.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no
wrote:
Hello all,
The below seems to be a bug, but perhaps it's unavoidably part of the indexing
mechanism?
It's easiest to show via example... note that using [0,1] to pull two columns
out of the array gives the same shape as using :2 in the simple case, but
when there's additional slicing
Hi Zach
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Zachary Pincus zachary.pin...@yale.edu wrote:
The below seems to be a bug, but perhaps it's unavoidably part of the
indexing mechanism?
It's easiest to show via example... note that using [0,1] to pull two
columns out of the array gives the same
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Zachary Pincus zachary.pin...@yale.edu
wrote:
The below seems to be a bug, but perhaps it's unavoidably part of the
indexing mechanism?
It's easiest to show via example... note that using [0,1] to pull two
columns out of the array gives the same shape as
On May 14, 2012, at 7:07 PM, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
Hi Zach
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Zachary Pincus zachary.pin...@yale.edu
wrote:
The below seems to be a bug, but perhaps it's unavoidably part of the
indexing mechanism?
It's easiest to show via example... note that using
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Paul Anton Letnes
paul.anton.let...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 12:12 AM,
13 matches
Mail list logo
