On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 4:47 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 7:39 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not *any* cost, this goes deep and wide, it's one of the basic
concepts of numpy that you want to rename.
The proposal I last made was to
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Pierre Barbier de Reuille
pierre.barbierdereui...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
I am trying to use titles for the record arrays. In the documentation, it
is specified that any column can set to None. However, trying this fails
on numpy 1.6.2 because in
as a lurker, may I say that this discussion seems to have become
non-productive?
It seems all agree that docs needs improvement, perhaps a first step would
be to suggest doc improvements, and then the need for renaming may become
self-evident, or not.
aww darn, ruined my lurker status.
Matti
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 1:51 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 4:47 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 7:39 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not *any* cost, this goes deep and wide, it's one of the
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 10:18 AM, matti picus matti.pi...@gmail.com wrote:
as a lurker, may I say that this discussion seems to have become
non-productive?
Well - the discussion is about two things - as so often the case on numpy.
The first is about the particular change.
The second is
Hi Ralf,
Ralf Gommers, on 2013-04-06 10:51, wrote:
P.P.S. expect an identical response from me to future proposals that
include backwards compatibility breaks of heavily used functions for
something that's not a functional enhancement or bug fix. Such proposals
are just not OK.
but it is a
Hello,
Do any core developers or uses have guidance on how to resolve PR #3188 (
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/3188) in relation to the pickling
behavior of array scalar objects?
To summarize, pickling array scalars with object fields, which are produced
when indexing record arrays with
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Paul Ivanov pivanov...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ralf,
Ralf Gommers, on 2013-04-06 10:51, wrote:
P.P.S. expect an identical response from me to future proposals that
include backwards compatibility breaks of heavily used functions for
something that's not a
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 1:51 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 4:47 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 7:39 PM,
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Alex Ford for...@uw.edu wrote:
Hello,
Do any core developers or uses have guidance on how to resolve PR #3188
(https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/3188) in relation to the pickling
behavior of array scalar objects?
To summarize, pickling array scalars with
Hi,
Not a developer here, but I was under the impression that you can only use
the BLAS/LAPACK libraries that where chosen at build time?
As a side note: I've read [1] that OpenBLAS on some systems could perform
quite well compared to ATLAS, I used some simple benchmarks [2] and noticed
that on
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 1:51 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 4:47 AM, Matthew
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Yes. I created an issue here for them to test it:
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/1809
Just to make sure.
There doesn't seem to be any more problems, so I am releasing 1.7.1 now.
Ondrej
13 matches
Mail list logo
