Re: [Numpy-discussion] Python PEP 450

2013-08-16 Thread Alan G Isaac
Hi Colin, I'm just the messenger. I thought this list might be interested. Feedback should go to Steven D'Aprano on comp.lang.python I think the PEP makes it clear that the target is not secondary students but rather users who want numerically robust versions of some basic statistical procedures

[Numpy-discussion] Python PEP 450

2013-08-16 Thread Colin J. Williams
This is to respond to Alan's message: Message: 7 Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 11:20:32 -0400 From: Alan G Isaac Subject: [Numpy-discussion] PEP 450 (stats module for standard     library) To: Discussion of Numerical Python Message-ID: <520e4340.5010...@g

Re: [Numpy-discussion] PEP 450 (stats module for standard library)

2013-08-16 Thread Valentin Haenel
* Chris Barker - NOAA Federal [2013-08-16]: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Alan G Isaac wrote: > > http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0450/ > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.lang.python/IV-3mobU7L0 > > as numpy is the "right" way to do this sort of stuff, I think this is > a b

Re: [Numpy-discussion] PEP 450 (stats module for standard library)

2013-08-16 Thread Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Alan G Isaac wrote: > http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0450/ > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.lang.python/IV-3mobU7L0 as numpy is the "right" way to do this sort of stuff, I think this is a better argument for a numpy-lite in the stdlib than anythi

[Numpy-discussion] PEP 450 (stats module for standard library)

2013-08-16 Thread Alan G Isaac
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0450/ https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.lang.python/IV-3mobU7L0 Alan Isaac ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Setter on array

2013-08-16 Thread Christian K.
Hi Hugo, Am 14.08.13 10:34, schrieb Hugo Gagnon: > What is the best way, if any, to "do something" whenever array elements > are changed in-place? For example, if I have a = arange(10), then > setting a[3] = 1 would, say, call a function automatically. a one made a simple subclass of ndarray whi

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Setter on array

2013-08-16 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On 14 Aug 2013 14:37, "Hugo Gagnon" wrote: > > Hi, > > What is the best way, if any, to "do something" whenever array elements > are changed in-place? For example, if I have a = arange(10), then > setting a[3] = 1 would, say, call a function automatically. There isn't really any reliable way to

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Setter on array

2013-08-16 Thread Pierre Haessig
Hi Hugo, Le 14/08/2013 15:34, Hugo Gagnon a écrit : > What is the best way, if any, to "do something" whenever array elements > are changed in-place? For example, if I have a = arange(10), then > setting a[3] = 1 would, say, call a function automatically. I've never seen such a signal mechanism s