Hi All,
NumPy 1.8.0rc1 is up now on
sourceforgehttp://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/1.8.0rc1/.The
binary builds are included except for Python 3.3 on windows, which
will arrive later. Many thanks to Ralf for the binaries, and to those who
found and fixed the bugs in the last beta.
On 30.09.2013 17:17, Charles R Harris wrote:
Hi All,
NumPy 1.8.0rc1 is up now on sourceforge
http://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/1.8.0rc1/ .The
binary builds are included except for Python 3.3 on windows, which will
arrive later. Many thanks to Ralf for the binaries, and to
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Julian Taylor
jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 30.09.2013 17:17, Charles R Harris wrote:
Hi All,
NumPy 1.8.0rc1 is up now on sourceforge
http://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/1.8.0rc1/ .The
binary builds are included except for
Everyone please do actually test this! It is really in your best
interest, and I think people don't always realize this.
Here's how it works:
- If you test it *now*, and it breaks your code that worked with 1.7,
and you *tell* us this now, then it's *our* problem and we hold up the
release to fix
Hi all,
current state of Python - MATLAB connection soft doesn't allow passing of
function handlers, however, a walkaround has been implemented via some tricks,
so now MATLAB function fmincon is available in Python-written OpenOpt and
FuncDesigner frameworks (with possibility of automatic
On 9/30/2013 11:02 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: Everyone please do
actually test this! It is really in your best
interest, and I think people don't always realize this.
Here's how it works:
- If you test it *now*, and it breaks your code that worked with 1.7,
and you *tell* us this now, then
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 9/30/2013 11:02 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: Everyone please do
actually test this! It is really in your best
interest, and I think people don't always realize this.
Here's how it works:
- If you test it *now*,
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 9/30/2013 11:02 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: Everyone please do
actually test this! It is really in your best
interest, and I
On 9/30/2013 3:45 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu
mailto:cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 9/30/2013 11:02 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: Everyone please do
actually test this! It is really in your best
interest, and I think
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 9/30/2013 3:45 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu
mailto:cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 9/30/2013 11:02 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: Everyone
On 01.10.2013 01:30, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu
mailto:cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 9/30/2013 3:45 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu
On 9/30/2013 4:44 PM, Julian Taylor wrote:
On 01.10.2013 01:30, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu
mailto:cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 9/30/2013 3:45 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 9/30/2013 4:44 PM, Julian Taylor wrote:
On 01.10.2013 01:30, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu
mailto:cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 9/30/2013 3:45
Hi,
What is the rationale for using False in 'mask' for elements that
should be included?
http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/maskedarray.generic.html
As opposed to using True for elements that should be included, which
is what I was intuitively expecting when I started using the masked
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
What is the rationale for using False in 'mask' for elements that
should be included?
http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/maskedarray.generic.html
As opposed to using True for elements that should be
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
What is the rationale for using False in 'mask' for elements that
should be included?
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 9/30/2013 4:44 PM, Julian Taylor wrote:
On 01.10.2013 01:30, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:12 PM,
On 2013/09/30 4:05 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
What is the rationale for using False in 'mask' for elements that
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
On 2013/09/30 4:05 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On 2013/09/30 4:57 PM, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
On 2013/09/30 4:05 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Ondřej
20 matches
Mail list logo
