Julian Taylor jtaylor.debian at googlemail.com writes:
can you show the code that is slow in numpy?
which version of gcc and libc are you using?
with gcc 4.8 it uses the glibc 2.17 sin/cos with fast-math, so there
should be no difference.
In trying to write some simple code to demonstrate it,
On 01.12.2013 21:53, Dan Goodman wrote:
Julian Taylor jtaylor.debian at googlemail.com writes:
can you show the code that is slow in numpy?
which version of gcc and libc are you using?
with gcc 4.8 it uses the glibc 2.17 sin/cos with fast-math, so there
should be no difference.
In trying
Julian Taylor jtaylor.debian at googlemail.com writes:
your sin and exp calls are loop invariants, they do not depend on the
loop iterable.
This allows to move the expensive functions out of the loop and only
leave some simple arithmetic in the body.
A! I feel extremely stupid for not
On 01.12.2013 22:59, Dan Goodman wrote:
Julian Taylor jtaylor.debian at googlemail.com writes:
your sin and exp calls are loop invariants, they do not depend on the
loop iterable.
This allows to move the expensive functions out of the loop and only
leave some simple arithmetic in the body.
Julian Taylor jtaylor.debian at googlemail.com writes:
On 01.12.2013 22:59, Dan Goodman wrote:
Julian Taylor jtaylor.debian at googlemail.com writes:
your sin and exp calls are loop invariants, they do not depend on the
loop iterable.
This allows to move the expensive functions out of
Dan Goodman dg.gmane at thesamovar.net writes:
...
I got around 5x slower. Using numexpr 'dumbly' (i.e. just putting the
expression in directly) was slower than the function above, but doing a
hybrid between the two approaches worked well:
def timefunc_numexpr_smart():
_sin_term =
